Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (2026)
Intervention; right; procedure
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who has or claims an interest in the matter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to an action, or against both, in any action pending or to be brought in any of the courts of the State of Nebraska, may become a party to an action between any other persons or corporations, either by joining the plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the complaint, or by uniting with the defendants in resisting the claim of the plaintiff, or by demanding anything adversely to both the plaintiff and defendant, either before or after issue has been joined in the action, and before the trial commences.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1945–2024 · leading case: In re Interest of Nizigiyimana R., 889 N.W.2d 362 (Neb. 2016).
In re Interest of Nizigiyimana R., 889 N.W.2d 362 (Neb. 2016). “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 2016), to be entitled to intervene in an action, a nonparty must show a direct and legal interest.”
Ruzicka v. Ruzicka, 635 N.W.2d 528 (Neb. 2001). “Appellees contend that the case turns on whether the personal representative or an heir is the proper party to defend a quiet title action involving real property to which title was held by Robert at the time of his death.”
In re Adoption of Jaelyn B., 293 Neb. 917 (Neb. 2016). “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 2008), to be entitled to intervene in an action, an intervenor must have a direct and legal interest.”
Kirchner v. Gast, 100 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. 1959). “It presents its right to intervene under the provisions of section 25-328, R. R. S. 1943. Defendant here challenges the District’s right to cross-appeal under the provisions of sections 25-1912 and 25-1913, R.”
Brown v. Jacobsen Land & Cattle Co., 297 Neb. 541 (Neb. 2017). “One who intervenes under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 2016) becomes a party to the litigation and has all the rights of a party.”
In Re Interest of Destiny S., 639 N.W.2d 400 (Neb. 2002). “Generally, intervention in civil actions is governed by Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 1995), which permits intervention by one "who has or claims an interest in the matter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to an action, or against both.”
Streck, Inc. v. Ryan Fam., 297 Neb. 773 (Neb. 2017). “§ 25-328 (Reissue 2016) provides: Any person who has or claims an interest in the mat- ter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to an action, or against both, in any action pending or to be brought in any of the courts of the State of Nebraska, may become a…”
Wayne L. Ryan Revocable Trust v. Ryan, 297 Neb. 761 (Neb. 2017). “They alleged a statutory right to intervene pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 2016). The intervenors’ complaint did not allege any issue with respect to the fair value of the RRT’s shares.”
Carroll v. Gould, 308 Neb. 12 (Neb. 2020). “8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 2016) elaborates that any person who claims an interest in the matter may become a party before trial commences: Any person who has or claims an interest in the mat- ter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to an action, or…”
Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. 0001 v. Johanns, 694 N.W.2d 668 (Neb. 2005). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Cum. Supp. 2004).”
In re Interest of Nettie F., 887 N.W.2d 45 (Neb. 2016). “We consid- ered their appeal under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-328 (Reissue 1995), which we later held serves as a guidepost for deciding whether a person can intervene in a juvenile proceeding.”
Lamar Co. of Nebraska, L.L.C. v. Omaha Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 713 N.W.2d 406 (Neb. 2006). “2004), which provides: Any person who has or claims an interest in the matter in litigation, in the success of either of the parties to an action, or against both, in any action pending or to be brought in *477 any of the courts of the State of Nebraska, may become a party to an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.