Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (2026)
Order, motion, or notice; service; delivery
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Whenever in any action or proceeding, any order, motion, notice, or other document, except a summons, is required by statute or rule of the Supreme Court to be served upon or given to any party, the service or delivery shall be made in accordance with the rules of pleading in civil actions promulgated by the Supreme Court pursuant to section 25-801.01.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: State on Behalf of AE v. Buckhalter, 730 N.W.2d 340 (Neb. 2007).
State on Behalf of AE v. Buckhalter, 730 N.W.2d 340 (Neb. 2007). “He contends that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995) required the State to serve him with notice of the property hearing at his “last-known address.”
Ventura v. State of Nebraska Equal Opportunity Comm'n, 517 N.W.2d 368 (Neb. 1994). “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1989), the Commission was authorized to serve the notice of the charge to Ventura’s attorney of record.”
State v. Johnson, 695 N.W.2d 165 (Neb. 2005). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995). In short, I disagree with the Nebraska Court of Appeals' conclusion that Johnson failed to follow the requirements of rule 9E and obviously disagree with the court's endorsement of that conclusion.”
N. States Beef v. Stennis, 509 N.W.2d 656 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). “Northern States argues that summons was timely issued because the petition was filed by mail and a file-stamped copy was returned to Stennis’ counsel on or about November 18, 1991, which was within 30 days of the filing of the praecipe on December 17.”
Wooden v. Cnty. of Douglas, 751 N.W.2d 151 (Neb. 2008). “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995); Neb.”
Ranger Div., Ryder Truck Lines, Inc. v. Bayne, 333 N.W.2d 891 (Neb. 1983). “Therefore, since the requisite petition *893 was served on appellee's attorney by mail, as provided for in Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1979), substantial compliance was had with § 48-1120(2).”
KLH Ret. Plan., Ltd. v. Okwumuo, 642 N.W.2d 801 (Neb. 2002). “01 by serving notice of publication on the attorneys of record for the appellants as provided for under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995). That section allows for service or notice of any document other than a summons to be given to a party’s attorney of record unless the…”
Schwarz v. Platte Valley Exterminating, Inc., 606 N.W.2d 85 (Neb. 2000). “However, because service was by mail upon opposing counsel, an additional 3 days is added to the prescribed period pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995), so that the responses were due on October 16.”
Osborn v. Osborn, 550 N.W.2d 58 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996). “2d 368 (1994) (finding that service upon attorney of record was permissible under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995) where notice statute, Neb.”
Roubal Ex Rel. Holm v. State, 710 N.W.2d 359 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 25-534 (Reissue 1995), which provides: Whenever in any action or proceeding, any order, motion, notice, or other document, except a summons, is required by statute or rule of the Supreme Court to be served upon or given to any party represented by an attorney whose appearance…”
Gen. Serv. Bureau, Inc. v. Moller, 672 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). “2d 368 (1994) (finding that service upon attorney of record was permissible under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1989) where notice statute, Neb.”
City of Lincoln v. MJM, INC., 618 N.W.2d 710 (Neb. Ct. App. 2000). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-534 (Reissue 1995) provides the procedures for properly serving an attorney.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.