Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 28
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

28-1463.03.

Transferred to section 28-1805.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: State v. Mather, 646 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mather, 646 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 52× “Mather was convicted by a jury in the district court for Cass County of 18 counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct which has a child as one of its participants in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) of the Child Pornography Prevention Act.”
State v. Burke, 408 N.W.2d 239 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 34× “04 specifies that a first time violation of any part of § 28-1463.03 constitutes a Class III felony.”
State v. Smith, 292 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 3× “Since the photographs were not available at trial and do not have corresponding exhibit numbers, we will refer to the photographs as photographs “1,” “2,” and “3” for purposes of our analysis.”
State v. McMillion, 23 Neb. Ct. App. 687 (Neb. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 3× “McMillion was also convicted of two counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Cum. Supp. 2014).”
State v. Senters, 699 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “But, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) of the Child Pornography Prevention Act (the Act), it is unlawful for “a person to knowingly make, publish, direct, create, provide, or in any manner generate any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct which has a…”
State v. Spidel, 634 N.W.2d 825 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 5× “On August 5, 1999, the State filed a three-count information in Lancaster County District Court charging Spidel with two counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) and one count of first degree…”
State v. Saulsbury, 498 N.W.2d 338 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 6× “See § 28-1463.03. Defendant filed a plea in abatement and a motion to quash the pornography charge on the basis that the statute was unconstitutionally vague or, alternatively, did not apply to his conduct.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “01; (d) Incest of a minor pursuant to section 28-703; (e) Pandering of a minor pursuant to section 28-802; (f) Visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to section 28-1463.03 or 28-1463.05; (g) Possessing any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct…”
Outmezguine v. State, 641 A.2d 870 (Md. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 45-5-625 (1993); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (1989); Nev.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 898 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Neb. 2012). · cites it 2× “01; (d) Incest of a minor pursuant to section 28-703; (e) Pandering of a minor pursuant to section 28-802; (f) Visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to section 28-1463.03 or 28-1463.05; (g) Possessing any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct…”
State v. Shepard, 477 N.W.2d 567 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 3× “§ 28-319 (Reissue 1989), and of manufacturing child pornography, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1989).”
State v. High, 407 N.W.2d 776 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 3× “Finally, defendant claims his sentence was excessive and disparate when compared to that of Joseph Burke, who was convicted of violating a later version of the same statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (1) (Reissue 1985), a part of the Child Pornography Prevention Act.”
Show all 25 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03(1) — 5 cases
State v. Mather, 646 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 2002). “Mather was convicted by a jury in the district court for Cass County of 18 counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct which has a child as one of its participants in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) of the Child Pornography Prevention Act.”
State v. Burke, 408 N.W.2d 239 (Neb. 1987). “04 specifies that a first time violation of any part of § 28-1463.03 constitutes a Class III felony.”
State v. Senters, 699 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2005). “But, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) of the Child Pornography Prevention Act (the Act), it is unlawful for “a person to knowingly make, publish, direct, create, provide, or in any manner generate any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct which has a…”
State v. Spidel, 634 N.W.2d 825 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001). “On August 5, 1999, the State filed a three-count information in Lancaster County District Court charging Spidel with two counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct of a child pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) and one count of first degree…”
State v. High, 407 N.W.2d 776 (Neb. 1987). “Finally, defendant claims his sentence was excessive and disparate when compared to that of Joseph Burke, who was convicted of violating a later version of the same statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03 (1) (Reissue 1985), a part of the Child Pornography Prevention Act.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1463.03(3) — 1 case
State v. Mather, 646 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. 2002). “Mather was convicted by a jury in the district court for Cass County of 18 counts of visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct which has a child as one of its participants in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 28-1463.03 (Reissue 1995) of the Child Pornography Prevention Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.