Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1607 (2026)
Information; preliminary examination; required; when
✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
No information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination therefor, as provided by law, unless such person shall waive his or her right to such examination, except as otherwise provided in the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. The preliminary examination shall be conducted as soon as the nature and the circumstances of the case will permit.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1945–2024 · leading case: State v. Boslau, 601 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 1999).
State v. Boslau, 601 N.W.2d 769 (Neb. 1999). “,” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Anderson, 943 N.W.2d 690 (Neb. 2020). “854 , 43 L. Ed. 2d 54 (1975). - 990 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports STATE v.”
State v. Hayes, 639 N.W.2d 418 (Neb. Ct. App. 2002). “” However, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 1995) provides that “[n]o information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination therefor .”
State v. Carrera, 911 N.W.2d 849 (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 2016).”
Parsons v. McCann, 138 F. Supp. 3d 1086 (D. Neb. 2015). “If the prosecuting attorney shall determine in any such case that an information ought not to be filed, he shall make, subscribe, and file with the clerk of the court a statement in writing, containing his reasons, in fact and in law, for not filing an information in such…”
State v. Thomas, 459 N.W.2d 204 (Neb. 1990). “attorney, after noting that the pleading filed September 11, 1987, was called an information, pointed out at the preliminary hearing that the “matter should properly be before the Court on a Complaint” and that defendant would not object to proceeding with the hearing as long as…”
Otte v. State, 108 N.W.2d 737 (Neb. 1961). “1943, clearly contemplates that prosecutions brought in the district court must be brought upon information regardless of whether the crime charged is a felony or a misdemeanor. We hold this contention to be without merit.”
State v. DeJesus, 347 N.W.2d 111 (Neb. 1984). “First, the defendant alleges the trial court erred in conducting the arraignment of the defendant without having had a preliminary hearing pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §29-1607 (Reissue 1979). The record shows that on March 3, 1983, the defendant was brought before the trial…”
State v. Simants, 236 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 1975). “The evidence in the hearing before the District Judge consisted principally of the testimony of the county judge who had entered the prior order and copies of numerous news articles from newspapers printed or circulated in the county where the crime occurred.”
Lingo v. Hann, 71 N.W.2d 716 (Neb. 1955). “See § 29-1607, R. R. S. 1943, as to a preliminary hearing and the right thereto.”
Rorerts v. State, 17 N.W.2d 666 (Neb. 1945). “1943, provides that “No information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination therefor, * * * unless such person shall waive his right to such examination; * * * .” Under this provision we have held that it is…”
State v. Scott, 403 N.W.2d 351 (Neb. 1987). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1607 (Reissue 1985) provides in part that “[n]o information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination therefor, as provided by law, unless such person shall waive his or her right to such…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.