Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2014 (2026)
Conspiracy; overt acts; allegations required; proof
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In trials for conspiracy, in cases where an overt act is required by law to consummate the offense, no conviction shall be had unless one or more overt acts be expressly alleged in the indictment, nor unless one or more of the acts so alleged be proved on trial; but other overt acts not alleged in the indictment may be given in evidence on the part of the prosecution.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2022 · leading case: State v. Theisen, 306 Neb. 591 (Neb. 2020).
State v. Theisen, 306 Neb. 591 (Neb. 2020). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2014 (Reissue 2016) specifies that the State must allege overt acts in charging conspiracy, by stating: In trials for conspiracy, in cases where an overt act is required by law to consummate the offense, no conviction shall be had unless one or more overt…”
State v. Marco, 432 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 1988). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2014 (Reissue 1985) provides: In trials for conspiracy, in cases where an overt act is required by law to consummate the offense, no conviction shall be had unless one or more overt acts be expressly alleged in the indictment, nor unless one or more of the…”
State v. Davis, 969 N.W.2d 861 (Neb. 2022). “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2014 (Reissue 2016).”
Beyl v. State, 85 N.W.2d 653 (Neb. 1957). “” See, also, section 29-2014, R. R. S. 1943, which provides: “In trials for conspiracy, in cases where an overt act is required by law to consummate the offense, no conviction shall be had unless one or more overt acts be expressly alleged in the indictment, nor unless one or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.