Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (2026)

Verdict; poll

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge. Before the verdict is accepted the jury may be polled at the request of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case: State v. Avina-Murillo, 301 Neb. 185 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Avina-Murillo, 301 Neb. 185 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Price, 306 Neb. 38 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “As part of this analysis, the Court of Appeals considered Price’s argument that he was entitled to poll the jury indi- vidually regarding whether the jury was deadlocked rather than relying on the assertion of the presiding juror.”
State v. Muse, 721 N.W.2d 661 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 1995) authorizes the polling of the jury "[b]efore the verdict is accepted" if requested by either party.”
State v. Combs, 297 Neb. 422 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016) provides, “When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge.”
Hyslop v. State, 68 N.W.2d 698 (Neb. 1955). “” See, also, § 29-2024, R. R. S. 1943; Longfellow v. State, 10 Neb.”
State v. Hiatt, 207 N.W.2d 678 (Neb. 1973). “§ 29-2024, R. R. S. 1943; Feddern v. State, 79 Neb.”
State v. Price (Neb. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 3× “Price first relies on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016), which states: “When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge.”
State v. Avina-Murillo, 301 Neb. 185 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “185 finally rendered in open court and received and accepted by the trial judge.9 With that understanding, we summarize what happened.”
Price v. Lewien (D. Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (providing that, when the jury agrees upon their verdict, it must be rendered into open court and “the jury may be polled at the request of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.