Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (2026)

Verdict; poll

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge. Before the verdict is accepted the jury may be polled at the request of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case: State v. Avina-Murillo, 917 N.W.2d 865 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Avina-Murillo, 917 N.W.2d 865 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Price, 944 N.W.2d 279 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “The Court of Appeals also distinguished State v.”
State v. Muse, 721 N.W.2d 661 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 1995) authorizes the polling of the jury "[b]efore the verdict is accepted" if requested by either party.”
State v. Combs, 900 N.W.2d 473 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016) provides, “When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge.”
Hyslop v. State, 68 N.W.2d 698 (Neb. 1955). “” See, also, § 29-2024, R. R. S. 1943; Longfellow v. State, 10 Neb.”
State v. Hiatt, 207 N.W.2d 678 (Neb. 1973). “§ 29-2024, R. R. S. 1943; Feddern v. State, 79 Neb.”
State v. Price, No. A-17-565, 2018 WL 718501 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2018). · cites it 3× “Price first relies on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (Reissue 2016), which states: “When the jury have agreed upon their verdict they must be conducted into court by the officer having them in charge.”
State v. Avina-Murillo, 301 Neb. 185 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “185 finally rendered in open court and received and accepted by the trial judge.9 With that understanding, we summarize what happened.”
Price v. Lewien, No. 4:23-cv-03209 (D. Neb. Apr. 14, 2025). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2024 (providing that, when the jury agrees upon their verdict, it must be rendered into open court and “the jury may be polled at the request of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.