For purposes of the Nebraska Probation Administration Act, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) Association means the Nebraska District Court Judges Association;
(2) Court means a district court, county court, or juvenile court as defined in section 43-245;
(3) Office means the Office of Probation Administration;
(4) Probation means a sentence under which a person found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea or adjudicated delinquent or in need of special supervision is released by a court subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to supervision. Probation includes post-release supervision and supervision ordered by a court pursuant to a deferred judgment under section 29-2292 or 29-4803;
(5) Probationer means a person sentenced to probation or post-release supervision;
(6) Probation officer means an employee of the system who supervises probationers and conducts presentence, predisposition, or other investigations as may be required by law or directed by a court in which he or she is serving or performs such other duties as authorized pursuant to section 29-2258, except unpaid volunteers from the community;
(7) Juvenile probation officer means any probation officer who supervises probationers of a separate juvenile court;
(8) Juvenile intake probation officer means an employee of the system who is called upon by a law enforcement officer in accordance with section 43-250 to make a decision regarding the furtherance of a juvenile's detention;
(9) Chief probation officer means the probation officer in charge of a probation district;
(10) System means the Nebraska Probation System;
(11) Administrator means the probation administrator;
(12) Non-probation-based program or service means a program or service established within the district, county, or juvenile courts and provided to individuals not sentenced to probation who have been charged with or convicted of a crime for the purpose of diverting the individual from incarceration or to provide treatment for issues related to the individual's criminogenic needs. Non-probation-based programs or services include, but are not limited to, problem solving courts established pursuant to section 24-1302 and the treatment of problems relating to substance abuse, mental health, sex offenses, or domestic violence;
(13) Post-release supervision means the portion of a split sentence following a period of incarceration under which a person found guilty of a crime upon verdict or plea is released by a court subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to supervision by the office; and
(14) Rules and regulations means policies and procedures written by the office and approved by the Supreme Court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
31
cases (
8 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case:
State v. Kennedy, 908 N.W.2d 69 (Neb. 2018).
State v. Kennedy, 908 N.W.2d 69 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 7× “8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (5) (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Dill, 913 N.W.2d 470 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 6× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Kantaras, 885 N.W.2d 558 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “” Those conditions include things such as undergoing psychiatric treatment,2 undergoing vocational 1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2008, Cum.”
State v. Dill, 300 Neb. 344 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 6× “11 5 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Gnewuch, 3 N.W.3d 295 (Neb. 2024).
· cites it 8× “The first constitutional principle is that “[n]o person shall . . . be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
State v. Wal, 923 N.W.2d 367 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 2× “8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (13) (Reissue 2016); Kennedy , supra note 7.”
State v. Applehans, 992 N.W.2d 464 (Neb. 2023).
· cites it 4× “2d 470 (2018) (discussing statutory framework regarding post-release supervision). 12 Neb. Ct. R. § 6-1904 (rev.”
State v. Phillips, 924 N.W.2d 699 (Neb. 2019).
· cites it 5× “8 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
State v. Schreiner, 754 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 2008).
· cites it 2× “[7] Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 1995 & Supp.”
State v. Galvan, 941 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 3× “Phillips 9 that in order to calculate a probationer’s “remaining period of post-release supervision,” the court must subtract the number of days actually served from the number of days ordered to be served.”
State v. Hense, 753 N.W.2d 832 (Neb. 2008).
· cites it 2× “See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (4) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Kinney, 350 N.W.2d 552 (Neb. 1984).
· cites it 4× “First of all, as defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (4) (Reissue 1979), probation is a sentence.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246(13): 9 cases
State v. Kennedy, 908 N.W.2d 69 (Neb. 2018).
“8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (5) (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Gnewuch, 3 N.W.3d 295 (Neb. 2024).
“The first constitutional principle is that “[n]o person shall . . . be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
State v. Galvan, 941 N.W.2d 183 (Neb. 2020).
“Phillips 9 that in order to calculate a probationer’s “remaining period of post-release supervision,” the court must subtract the number of days actually served from the number of days ordered to be served.”
State v. Applehans, 992 N.W.2d 464 (Neb. 2023).
“2d 470 (2018) (discussing statutory framework regarding post-release supervision). 12 Neb. Ct. R. § 6-1904 (rev.”
State v. Phillips, 924 N.W.2d 699 (Neb. 2019).
“8 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246(14): 2 cases
State v. Dill, 913 N.W.2d 470 (Neb. 2018).
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Dill, 300 Neb. 344 (Neb. 2018).
“11 5 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246(3): 3 cases
State v. Dill, 913 N.W.2d 470 (Neb. 2018).
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Dill, 300 Neb. 344 (Neb. 2018).
“11 5 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Applehans, 992 N.W.2d 464 (Neb. 2023).
“2d 470 (2018) (discussing statutory framework regarding post-release supervision). 12 Neb. Ct. R. § 6-1904 (rev.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246(4): 12 cases
State v. Dill, 913 N.W.2d 470 (Neb. 2018).
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Kennedy, 908 N.W.2d 69 (Neb. 2018).
“8 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (5) (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Gnewuch, 3 N.W.3d 295 (Neb. 2024).
“The first constitutional principle is that “[n]o person shall . . . be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.”
State v. Kinney, 350 N.W.2d 552 (Neb. 1984).
“First of all, as defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246 (4) (Reissue 1979), probation is a sentence.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2246(5): 7 cases
State v. Dill, 913 N.W.2d 470 (Neb. 2018).
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Dill, 300 Neb. 344 (Neb. 2018).
“11 5 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Phillips, 924 N.W.2d 699 (Neb. 2019).
“8 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2246 to 29-2269 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.