Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-106 (2026)

Division; aircraft; purchase; use; report; contents

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The division may purchase aircraft for the use of state government and may sell any state aircraft that is not needed or suitable for state uses. State aircraft shall be subject at all times to the written orders of the Governor for use and service in any branch of the state government. The division shall establish an hourly rate for use of a state aircraft by a state official or agency. The hourly rate shall not include an amount to recover the cost of acquisition by purchase, but shall include amounts for items such as variable fuel and oil costs, routine maintenance costs, landing fees, and preventive maintenance reserves. Such funds shall only be expended for the purposes provided for by this section.

(2) It is the intent of the Legislature that the use of state-owned, chartered, or rented aircraft by the division shall be for the sole purpose of state business. The division shall electronically file with the Clerk of the Legislature a quarterly report on the use of all state-owned, chartered, or rented aircraft by the division that includes the following information for each trip: The name of the agency or other entity traveling; the name of each individual passenger; all purposes of the trip; the destination and intermediate stops; the miles flown; and the duration of the trip.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: In re Est. of Fuchs, 297 Neb. 667 (Neb. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Est. of Fuchs, 297 Neb. 667 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 4× “In making that contention, they rely upon § 3-106 of the Uniform Probate Code, which binds 5 95 C.”

Schuyler Co-op. Ass'n v. Sahs, 755 N.W.2d 802 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 3-106 (Reissue 2001) (defining unconditional promise).”

Emerson v. Zagurski, 531 N.W.2d 237 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 3-106 (Reissue 1992). Second, the amount of money must be “a fixed amount.”

Henderson State Bank v. Lowderman (D. Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “§ 3-3023; that Plaintiff knew 3 This statute provides in part: (a) Subject to subsection (c) and section 3-106(d), “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument if: (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of…”

Affinity First Fed. Credit Union v. Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd. (D. Kan. 2023). “Ann § 382-A:3-106; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-106 ; 13 Pa. Stat. and Cons.”

In re Petition for Rule to Create Vol. State Bar Assn. (Neb. 2013). “§ 3-106. Communications in official confidence; immunity.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-106(d) — 1 case

Henderson State Bank v. Lowderman (D. Neb. 2020). “§ 3-3023; that Plaintiff knew 3 This statute provides in part: (a) Subject to subsection (c) and section 3-106(d), “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument if: (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.