A will or any part thereof is revoked
(1) by a subsequent will which, as is evident either from its terms or from competent evidence of its terms, revokes the prior will or part expressly or by inconsistency; or
(2) by being burned, torn, canceled, obliterated, or destroyed, with the intent and for the purpose of revoking it by the testator or by another person in the presence of and by the direction of the testator.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case:
In Re Est. of Mecello, 633 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2001).
In Re Est. of Mecello, 633 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 2× “All others are Revoked! " Neb.Rev.Stat. § 30-2332(1) (Reissue 1995) provides that a will is revoked "by a subsequent will which, as is evident either from its terms or from competent evidence of its terms, revokes the prior will or part expressly or by inconsistency.”
In Re Est. of Thompson, 336 N.W.2d 590 (Neb. 1983).
· cites it 5× “It is the son’s contention that although the above-cited testimony is insufficient to establish the distributive provisions of the 1965 will so as to entitle it to probate, the evidence is sufficient to establish that a will was duly made and executed after the 1964 will such as…”
Kitta v. Geringer, 633 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 2× “*515 The majority did not address the effect of the note allegedly attached to the 1991 will which was dated May 9, 1998, and which stated, “This is my will____All others are Revoked!” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2332 (1) (Reissue 1995) provides that a will is revoked “by a subsequent…”
In re Est. of Knapp, 33 N.W.3d 250 (Neb. 2026).
· cites it 2× “- 158 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 321 Nebraska Reports IN RE ESTATE OF KNAPP agreement. 3 Specific relevant provisions of the agreement are set forth below, but, generally, Paul and Barbara agreed that their separate property would remain separate.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2332(1): 1 case
In Re Est. of Mecello, 633 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2001).
“All others are Revoked! " Neb.Rev.Stat. § 30-2332(1) (Reissue 1995) provides that a will is revoked "by a subsequent will which, as is evident either from its terms or from competent evidence of its terms, revokes the prior will or part expressly or by inconsistency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.