Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 30
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (2026)

Ademption by satisfaction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Property which a testator gave in his lifetime to a person is treated as a satisfaction of a devise to that person in whole or in part only if the will provides for deduction of the lifetime gift, or the testator declares in a writing contemporaneous with the gift that it is to be deducted from the devise or is in satisfaction of the devise, or the devisee acknowledges in a writing contemporaneous with the gift that it is in satisfaction. For purpose of partial satisfaction, property given during lifetime is valued as of the time the devisee came into possession or enjoyment of the property or as of the time of death of the testator, whichever occurs first.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1980–2019 · leading case: In re Est. of Radford, 297 Neb. 748 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Est. of Radford, 297 Neb. 748 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 7× “Applying Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 2016), the court ruled that a gift from Sheila Foxley Radford to Mary, which preceded the Trust’s restatement but was acknowledged by Mary as an inheritance in a contemporaneous writing, was in satisfaction of Mary’s inheritance from…”
In re Est. of Radford, 304 Neb. 205 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 17× “On appeal, Mary chal- lenges the application of the ademption statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 2016), to the trust.”
In Re Est. of McFayden, 454 N.W.2d 676 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 11× “The county court found that none of the gifts to Sample on or before May 17,1984, constituted advancements under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 1989).”
In Re Est. of Soule, 540 N.W.2d 118 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 5× “Without reaching the thorny issue of which statute applies to this estate which passed in partial intestacy, we affirm the judgment of the county court for the reason that none of the gifts made by the conservator on behalf of Soule was accompanied by a contemporaneous writing…”
Bauer v. Bedient, 700 N.W.2d 572 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 1995).”
In Re Est. of McClow, 290 N.W.2d 186 (Neb. 1980). “The appellant, however, says: “It seems very clear that the events in subsections (a) and (b) are relevant only if the testator was under a conservatorship or guardianship.”
In Re Est. of Poach, 600 N.W.2d 172 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 1995); Reed v.”
In re Est. of Bowley (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2350 (Reissue 2008).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.