Upon petition and after notice and hearing in accordance with the provisions of this part, the court may appoint a conservator or make other protective order for cause as follows:
(1) Appointment of a conservator or other protective order may be made in relation to the estate and property affairs of a minor if the court is satisfied by clear and convincing evidence that a minor owns money or property that requires management or protection which cannot otherwise be provided, has or may have business affairs which may be jeopardized or prevented by his or her minority, or that funds are needed for his or her support and education and that protection is necessary or desirable to obtain or provide funds.
(2) Appointment of a conservator or other protective order may be made in relation to the estate and property affairs of a person if the court is satisfied by clear and convincing evidence that (i) the person is unable to manage his or her property and property affairs effectively for reasons such as mental illness, mental deficiency, physical illness or disability, chronic use of drugs, chronic intoxication, confinement, or lack of discretion in managing benefits received from public funds, detention by a foreign power, or disappearance; and (ii) the person has property which will be wasted or dissipated unless proper management is provided, or that funds are needed for the support, care, and welfare of the person or those entitled to be supported by him or her and that protection is necessary or desirable to obtain or provide funds.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Guardianship of Donley, 631 N.W.2d 839 (Neb. 2001).
· cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630 (Reissue 1995) (conservator may be appointed if trial court is satisfied by clear and convincing evidence that (1) person is unable to manage his or her property effectively and (2) person has property which will be wasted or dissipated unless…”
In Re Est. of Wagner, 522 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1994).
· cites it 3× “The requirements for the appointment of conservator, as set forth in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630 (2) (Reissue 1989), are that (i) the person is unable to manage his or her property and property affairs effectively for reasons such as mental illness, mental deficiency, physical…”
Guardianship & Conservatorship of Sim, 403 N.W.2d 721 (Neb. 1987).
· cites it 4× “The relevant portions of § 30-2630 provide: Upon petition and after notice and hearing in accordance with the provisions of this part, the court may appoint a conservator or make other protective order for cause as follows: (2) Appointment of a conservator or other protective…”
In Re Est. of Wagner, 367 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1985).
· cites it 7× “The standard of review of an order either appointing or denying the appointment of a conservator under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630 (Cum. Supp. 1984) is set out by statute.”
In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of J.F., 307 Neb. 452 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 2× “452 person who is impaired by reason of mental illness, mental deficiency, physical illness or disability, chronic use of drugs, chronic intoxication, or other cause (except minority) to the extent that the person lacks sufficient understanding or capac- ity to make or…”
In re Conservatorship of Franke, 875 N.W.2d 408 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “But he argues that the abatement on appeal requires us to vacate the county court’s previous orders appointing a conservator.”
In Re Conservatorship of Hanson, 682 N.W.2d 207 (Neb. 2004).
· cites it 2× “protective proceedings, the appointment of a conservator is based upon a judicial determination that it is necessary to protect the property of one who is unable to manage his or her property and affairs effectively for various reasons, including “physical illness or…”
In Re Guardianship of Bremer, 307 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 1981).
· cites it 2× “In essence, he was acting not only as guardian of the person but, under appropriate protective order, as a special conservator under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630 (Reissue 1979).”
In Re Est. of Oltmer, 336 N.W.2d 560 (Neb. 1983).
· cites it 10× “The appellant argues that § 30-2630, prior to the 1982 amendment, did not apply to the appellant because the statute used only the pronoun for the male gender.”
In Re Est. of McClow, 290 N.W.2d 186 (Neb. 1980).
“1943; § 30-2630 (2), R. R. S. 1943; § 30-2326, R.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630(2) — 8 cases
In Re Est. of Wagner, 367 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1985).
“The standard of review of an order either appointing or denying the appointment of a conservator under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630 (Cum. Supp. 1984) is set out by statute.”
In Re Est. of Oltmer, 336 N.W.2d 560 (Neb. 1983).
“The appellant argues that § 30-2630, prior to the 1982 amendment, did not apply to the appellant because the statute used only the pronoun for the male gender.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630(2)(i) — 1 case
Guardianship & Conservatorship of Sim, 403 N.W.2d 721 (Neb. 1987).
“The relevant portions of § 30-2630 provide: Upon petition and after notice and hearing in accordance with the provisions of this part, the court may appoint a conservator or make other protective order for cause as follows: (2) Appointment of a conservator or other protective…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2630(2)(ii) — 2 cases
Guardianship & Conservatorship of Sim, 403 N.W.2d 721 (Neb. 1987).
“The relevant portions of § 30-2630 provide: Upon petition and after notice and hearing in accordance with the provisions of this part, the court may appoint a conservator or make other protective order for cause as follows: (2) Appointment of a conservator or other protective…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.