Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 32
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-201 (2026)

Disputed points of election law; Secretary of State; duties

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of State shall decide disputed points of election law. The decisions shall have the force of law until changed by the courts.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Davis v. Gale, 908 N.W.2d 618 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Gale, 908 N.W.2d 618 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “3 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-201 (Reissue 2016) (providing Secretary of State decisions on election law have force of law until changed by courts).”
Chaney v. Evnen, 949 N.W.2d 761 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “Wieland v. Beermann, 246 Neb. 808 , 523 N.”
State ex rel. Loontjer v. Gale, 853 N.W.2d 494 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 4× “It is true that we noted the Secretary’s authority to reject a proposed measure under § 32-1409(3).”
Allen v. Tobin, 51 N.W.2d 338 (Neb. 1952). · cites it 4× “Section 32-201, R. S. 1943, provides: “All state, district, county, precinct and township officers, by the constitution and laws made elective by the people, except school district officers and municipal officers in cities and villages, shall be elected at a general election to…”
State ex rel. Spung v. Evnen, 317 Neb. 800 (2024). · cites it 3× “McMichael, 358 F. Supp. 2d 644 (E.D. Mich. 2005); People ex rel.”
Dobrovolny v. Moore, 936 F. Supp. 1536 (D. Neb. 1996). · cites it 2× “Under the provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 32-201 (Miehie 1995), defendant Scott Moore has authority to decide disputed points of Nebraska election law.”
State ex rel. Spung v. Evnen, 12 N.W.3d 229 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 3× “McMichael, 358 F. Supp. 2d 644 (E.D. Mich. 2005); People ex rel.”
Davis v. Gale, 299 Neb. 377 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “Standard of R eview and Propositions of Law The issue is one of statutory interpretation, which presents a question of law.”
Common Cause v. Evnen, 36 N.W.3d 490 (Neb. 2026). · cites it 2× “§ 25-21 ,154 (Reissue 2016) expressly provides that a court “may refuse to render or enter a declaratory judgment or decree where such judgment or decree, if rendered or entered, would not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding.”
Barton v. City of Omaha, 145 N.W.2d 444 (Neb. 1966). “See, §§ 32-201, 32-210, 32-226, and 32-492, R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.