(1) The county board shall, if it finds (a) that the conditions set forth in section 39-1713 or 39-1714 exist, (b) that the isolated land was not isolated at the time it was purchased by the owner or that the owner acquired the land directly from the State of Nebraska, (c) that the isolation of the land was not caused by the owner or by any other person with the knowledge and consent of the owner, and (d) that access is necessary for existing utilization of the isolated land, proceed to provide an access road and, if it finds that the amount of use and the number of persons served warrants such action, may lay out a public road to such real estate.
(2) The county board shall appraise the damages to be suffered by the owner or owners of the real estate over or through which the access road will be provided. Such damages shall be paid by the person petitioning that the access road be provided. For any real estate purchased or otherwise acquired after January 1, 1982, for which public access is granted pursuant to sections 39-1713 to 39-1719, the person petitioning for such access shall also reimburse the county for all engineering and construction costs incurred in providing such access.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, an access road provided in accordance with this section shall not be subject to Chapter 39, article 20 or 21. The designation of such an access road shall not impose on the State of Nebraska or any political subdivision any obligation of design, construction, or maintenance for the access road nor give rise to any cause of action against the state or any political subdivision with respect to the access road.
Notes of Decisions
Young v. Dodge Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 493 N.W.2d 160 (Neb. 1992).
· cites it 17× “hat the same is shut out from all public roads, other than a waterway, by being surrounded on all sides by real estate belonging to other persons, or by such real estate and by water, (3) that he is unable to purchase from any of such persons the right-of-way over or through the…”
Smith v. Mark Chrisman Trucking, 829 N.W.2d 717 (Neb. 2013).
· cites it 2× “] § 39-1716 (Reissue 1988) does not evidence an intent for retroactive applica- tion of the statute, but evidences a legislative intent that the 1982 amendment of § 39-1716 apply prospectively, that is, apply to any real estate acquired after January 1, 1982.”
Singleton v. Kimball Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 279 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 10× “The Singletons brought the mandamus action after the board voted to deny their affidavit requesting that a road be laid out pursuant to section 39-1716, R. R. S. 1943. *431 The board’s 12 assignments of error consolidate into the following: (1) The court erred in finding that…”
Teadtke v. Havranek, 777 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2010).
“See § 39-1716. It is important to note that the relief available under §§ 39-1713 through 39-1719 is limited to owners of "isolated" lands.”
Young v. Dodge Cnty. Bd. of Sup'rs, 493 N.W.2d 160 (Neb. 1992).
· cites it 17× “described therein located within the county, (2) that the same is shut out from all public roads, other than a waterway, by being surrounded on all sides by real estate belonging to other persons, or by such real estate and by water, (3) that he is unable to purchase from any of…”
Lewis v. Bd. of Com'rs of Loup Cnty., 529 N.W.2d 745 (Neb. 1995).
· cites it 6× “her persons, or by such real estate and by water, (3) that he or she is unable to purchase from any of such persons the right-of-way over or through the same to a public road or that it cannot be purchased except at an exorbitant price, stating the lowest price for which the…”
Lewis v. Bd. of Commissioners, 529 N.W.2d 745 (Neb. 1995).
· cites it 6× “her persons, or by such real estate and by water, (3) that he or she is unable to purchase from any of such persons the right-of-way over or through the same to a public road or that it cannot be purchased except at an exorbitant price, stating the lowest price for which the…”
Singleton v. Kimball Cty. Bd. of Com'rs, 279 N.W.2d 112 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 10× “The Singletons brought the mandamus action after the board voted to deny their affidavit requesting that a road be laid out pursuant to section 39-1716, R.R.S.1943. The board's 12 assignments of error consolidate into the following: (1) The court erred in finding that mandamus…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.