Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
39-669.15.
Transferred to section 60-6,205.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1975–1996 · leading case: State v. Young
State v. Young (1996)
“The officer also impounded Young's driver's license pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 (Cum.Supp.1992) (now codified at Neb.”
State v. Young (1995)
“At the time of his arrest, his license was impounded pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (Cum. Supp. 1992), and he petitioned the Nebraska Department of *541 Motor Vehicles for an administrative hearing to appeal the automatic revocation of his driver’s license.”
Dozler v. Conrad (1995)
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (6)(a) (Cum. Supp.”
Gausman v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Gausman was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License” which stated, inter alia, that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that Gausman had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor and that Gausman was validly…”
McPherrin v. Conrad (1995)
“As a result, under the provisions of the administrative license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.15 through 39-669.”
Hoyle v. Peterson (1984)
“See, §§ 39-669.15 and 39-669.16; Stevenson v. Sullivan, 190 Neb.”
Dannehl v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Cain for 90 days each, in accordance with the administrative driver’s license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
Abbott v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Abbott was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License,” which indicated she had submitted to a breath test.”
Porter v. Jensen (1986)
“As a consequence, Hines, pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (Reissue 1984), reported to the director that Porter had refused to submit to a breath test.”
Moore v. Peterson (1984)
“*616 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (Reissue 1978) requires the arresting officer to make a “sworn report” to the director concerning the arrest and refusal of the arrested person to submit to the required test.”
Mahlendorf v. Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Mahlendorf had his license revoked pursuant to the automatic license revocation provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
State v. Brittain (1982)
“Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 (Reissue 1978).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(2) — 1 case
Mahlendorf v. Nebraska Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Mahlendorf had his license revoked pursuant to the automatic license revocation provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(3) — 3 cases
Dozler v. Conrad (1995)
“See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (6)(a) (Cum. Supp.”
Gausman v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Gausman was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License” which stated, inter alia, that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that Gausman had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor and that Gausman was validly…”
Dannehl v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Cain for 90 days each, in accordance with the administrative driver’s license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(4) — 3 cases
State v. Young (1996)
“The officer also impounded Young's driver's license pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 (Cum.Supp.1992) (now codified at Neb.”
Gausman v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Gausman was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License” which stated, inter alia, that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that Gausman had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor and that Gausman was validly…”
Dannehl v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Cain for 90 days each, in accordance with the administrative driver’s license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(6)(a) — 1 case
McPherrin v. Conrad (1995)
“As a result, under the provisions of the administrative license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.15 through 39-669.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(6)(c) — 1 case
State v. Young (1996)
“The officer also impounded Young's driver's license pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.15 (Cum.Supp.1992) (now codified at Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(6)(c)(ii) — 2 cases
McPherrin v. Conrad (1995)
“As a result, under the provisions of the administrative license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 39-669.15 through 39-669.”
State v. Young (1995)
“At the time of his arrest, his license was impounded pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 (Cum. Supp. 1992), and he petitioned the Nebraska Department of *541 Motor Vehicles for an administrative hearing to appeal the automatic revocation of his driver’s license.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(6)(c)(ii)(A) — 2 cases
Gausman v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Gausman was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License” which stated, inter alia, that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that Gausman had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor and that Gausman was validly…”
Dannehl v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Cain for 90 days each, in accordance with the administrative driver’s license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15(7) — 4 cases
Gausman v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Gausman was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License” which stated, inter alia, that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that Gausman had operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcoholic liquor and that Gausman was validly…”
Abbott v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994)
“Pursuant to § 39-669.15, Abbott was given a “Notice/Sworn Report/Temporary License,” which indicated she had submitted to a breath test.”
Dannehl v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1995)
“Cain for 90 days each, in accordance with the administrative driver’s license revocation statutes, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.15 et seq. (Reissue 1988 & Cum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.