Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 42
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-341 (2026)

Decree of another jurisdiction; no force or effect; when

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A divorce from the bonds of matrimony obtained in another jurisdiction shall be of no force or effect in this state, if both parties to the marriage were domiciled in this state at the time the proceeding for the divorce was commenced except as provided in section 30-2353.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1955–2023 · leading case: Weber v. Weber, 265 N.W.2d 436 (Neb. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Weber v. Weber, 265 N.W.2d 436 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 17× “The respondent has appealed to this court, contending that the District Court erred in (1) failing to recognize the foreign divorce decree; (2) finding that the property settlement executed by the parties was unconscionable; (3) failing to hold sections 42-341 and 42-366, R. R.…”
Windham v. Kroll, 951 N.W.2d 744 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “See, also, Charleen J. v. Blake O., 289 Neb. 454 , 855 N.”
Dyer v. Tsapis, 249 S.E.2d 509 (W. Va. 1978). “[1967]; Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-341 et. seq. [1971]; Or.”
Miller v. Miller, 328 N.W.2d 210 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “It may also be that any dissolution finally granted by the California court would not be enforceable under the provisions of the Nebraska Uniform Divorce Recognition Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 42-341 et seq. (Reissue 1978).”
McGuire v. Califano, 440 F. Supp. 1031 (D. Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Clark, The Law of Domestic Relations in the United States § 11.2, at 287-89 (1968). Since no argument has been made that the California Superior Court was without jurisdiction to divorce Dean and Geraldine McGuire, this Court need only concern itself with the date that the…”
Bleich v. Bleich, 981 N.W.2d 801 (Neb. 2022). “However, the Court stated that a person may be precluded from attacking the validity of a foreign divorce decree if it would be inequitable for her or him to do so.”
Boyter v. Comm'r, 74 T.C. 989 (Tax Ct. 1980). “The dissenters, although objecting vigorously to the majority's view with regard to the validity of the divorce, felt that a rule invalidating such divorces should be applied prospectively. We express no views on how the New York courts would view a foreign divorce obtained in…”
Michael Adjei v. Alejandro Mayorkas, 59 F.4th 659 (4th Cir. 2023). “, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-341 ; N.H. Rev. Stat.”
Yost v. Yost, 72 N.W.2d 689 (Neb. 1955). “” § 42-341, R. R. S. 1943. “Proof that a person obtaining a divorce from the *170 bonds of matrimony in another jurisdiction was (1) domiciled in this state within twelve months prior to the commencement of the proceeding therefor, and resumed residence in this state within…”
Zenker v. Zenker, 72 N.W.2d 809 (Neb. 1955). · cites it 3× “” § 42-341, R. R. S. 1943. For the purposes of the present case we are required to hold that the allegation in the answer that the parties to the marriagé were both domiciled in.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.