Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 42
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 42-901 to 42-930 shall be known and may be cited as the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1982–2026 · leading case: Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Maria A. on behalf of Leslie G. v. Oscar G., 301 Neb. 673 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “For the purposes of the Act, abuse is defined by § 42-903(1) as the occurrence of one or more of the following acts between family or household members: (a) Attempting to cause or intentionally and knowingly causing bodily injury with or without a dangerous instrument; (b)…”
Robert M. on behalf of Bella O. v. Danielle O., 303 Neb. 268 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act (the Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901 et seq. (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Diedra T. v. Justina R., 984 N.W.2d 312 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 32 We relied upon that statutory language in con- cluding that not only is the recipient or target of a credible threat a “victim” of abuse eligible for a domestic abuse pro- tection order under § 42-924, so too are those family members for whose safety the target reasonably…”
State Ex Rel. Williams v. Marsh, 626 S.W.2d 223 (Mo. 1982). · cites it 2× “209A, §§ 1-6 (Michie/Law Co-op 1981); Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 42-901 to 927 (1943). The statutes vary greatly in their provisions; some are available only if a dissolution proceeding is pending, some make contempt the remedy for violation of an order, others make violation of an order…”
Garrison v. Otto, 311 Neb. 94 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “10 Family or household members includes former spouses. 11 [4] We have also held, in the context of a court’s decision to affirm or rescind an initial ex parte protection order, that a finding that domestic abuse has occurred does not end a court’s inquiry.”
Torres v. Morales, 287 Neb. 587 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 2× “BACKGROUND The Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901 et seq. (Reissue 2008 & Cum.”
Aguilar v. Valdez-Mendoza, 318 Neb. 402 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 4× “3 In the context of a court’s deciding whether to affirm or rescind the initial ex parte protection order, we have held that whether domestic abuse occurred is a threshold issue, and absent abuse as defined by § 42-903(1), a protec- tion order may not remain in effect.”
Courtney v. Jimenez, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 75 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “(Reissue 2016), pro- vides that a victim of domestic abuse may file a petition and affidavit for a protection order with the clerk of the district court. § 42-924. Section 42-925 provides that domestic abuse protection orders, as defined under § 42-924, may be issued ex parte.”
Rachel C. on behalf of Clayton R. v. Amos R., 32 Neb. Ct. App. 473 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “The Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901 et seq. (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Cloeter v. Cloeter, 770 N.W.2d 660 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “ANALYSIS The Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 42-901 et seq. *665 (Reissue 2008), allows any victim of domestic abuse to file a petition and affidavit for a protection order pursuant to § 42-924.”
Garrison v. Otto, 311 Neb. 94 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “10 Family or household members includes former spouses. 11 [4] We have also held, in the context of a court’s decision to affirm or rescind an initial ex parte protection order, that a finding that domestic abuse has occurred does not end a court’s inquiry.”
Buda ex rel. Buda v. Humble, 517 N.W.2d 622 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “On behalf of himself and his children, Adam Buda and Ali Buda, Santo Buda applied for a protection order under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901 et seq. (Reissue 1988, Cum.”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901(1)(a) — 1 case
Harris v. Snowden (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-901(1)(b) — 1 case
Harris v. Snowden (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.