Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 44
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515 (2026)

Automobile liability policy; notice of cancellation; requirements; exceptions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A notice of cancellation of a policy shall be effective only if it is based on one or more of the following reasons:

(a) Nonpayment of premium;

(b) Fraud or material misrepresentation affecting the policy or in the presentation of a claim thereunder, or violation of any of the terms or conditions of the policy; or

(c) The named insured or any operator, either resident in the same household or who customarily operates an automobile insured under the policy, (i) has had his or her driver's license suspended or revoked pursuant to law, (ii) has been convicted of larceny of an automobile, or theft of an automobile in violation of section 28-516, (iii) has been convicted of an offense for which such suspension or revocation is mandatory, or (iv) whose driver's license is subject to revocation or suspension pursuant to the provisions of sections 60-4,182 to 60-4,186, by reason of his or her driving record as disclosed by the files of the Director of Motor Vehicles during the policy period or, if the policy is a renewal, during its policy period or the one hundred eighty days immediately preceding its effective date.

(2) This section shall not apply to any policy or coverage which has been in effect less than sixty days at the time notice of cancellation is mailed or delivered by the insurer unless it is a renewal policy.

(3) This section shall not apply to nonrenewal.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1976–2017 · leading case: Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 48× “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 400 N.W.2d 250 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 14× “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [ Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984)].”
Saunders v. Mittlieder, 237 N.W.2d 838 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 8× “1943, which provides, so far as material herein, as follows: “(1) No notice of cancellation of a policy to which section 44-515 applies shall be effective unless mailed by registered or certified mail to the named insured at least thirty days prior to the effective date of…”
City of Columbus v. Swanson, 708 N.W.2d 225 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 4× “2000) provided: No notice of cancellation of a policy to which section 44-515 applies shall be effective unless mailed by registered or certified mail to the named insured at least thirty days prior to the effective date of cancellation, except that if cancellation is for…”
Conover v. Dairyland Ins., 265 N.W.2d 222 (Neb. 1978). “1396, Laws of 1972, among other things, specifies the reasons which permit the cancellation of a policy, § 44-515, R. R. S. 1943, and the method by which notice of cancellation must be given, § 44-516, R.”
Barnes v. Am. Stand. Ins. Co. of Wis., 297 Neb. 331 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “[9,10] As we have stated above, § 44-516(1) provides that “[n]o notice of cancellation of a policy to which section 44-515 applies shall be effective unless mailed .”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(1) — 1 case
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(1)(a) — 1 case
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(1)(b) — 1 case
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(2) — 1 case
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(l)(a) — 1 case
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 400 N.W.2d 250 (Neb. 1987). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [ Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984)].”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-515(l)(b) — 2 cases
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 361 N.W.2d 559 (Neb. 1985). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984) ].”
Glockel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 400 N.W.2d 250 (Neb. 1987). “Whether the exclusive method of terminating an automobile liability insurance policy is controlled by [ Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-515 to 44-521 (Reissue 1984)].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.