Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 46
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-210 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

46-210.

Transferred to section 61-207.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1951–1996 · leading case: City of Lincoln v. Twin Platte Nat. Resources Dist., 551 N.W.2d 6 (Neb. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Lincoln v. Twin Platte Nat. Resources Dist., 551 N.W.2d 6 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 3× “The time for perfecting such appeal shall be limited to thirty days after the rendition of such decision or order .”
Cent. Nebraska Pub. Power & Irrigation Dist. v. John D., 413 N.W.2d 290 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “The proper standard of review for this court to follow in cases involving appeals from DWR under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-210 (Reissue 1984) is to search only for errors appearing in the record; i.”
Cent. Nebraska Conservation Ass'n v. City of Fremont, 480 N.W.2d 709 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “CNCA’s Prairie Bend project is a proposed water diversion project on the Platte River to replenish ground water supplies depleted due to irrigation.”
Hitchcock & Red Willow Irrigation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 410 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 46-210 (Reissue 1984) provides in part as follows: The procedure to obtain such reversal, modification, or vacation of any such decision or order upon which a hearing has been had before the Department of Water Resources shall be governed by the same provisions in force with…”
Upper Big Blue Nat. Resources Dist. v. City of Fremont, 495 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “V, § 1,” which provides that “[t]he judicial power of the state shall be vested in a Supreme Court, district courts, county courts . .. and such other courts inferior to the Supreme Court as may be created by law.”
Catherland Reclamation Dist. v. Lower Platte North Nat. Resources Dist., 433 N.W.2d 161 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “Regarding the granting of water diversion applications, our standard of review is to (1) search for errors appearing in the record; (2) determine whether the judgment conforms to law and whether it is supported by competent and relevant evidence; and (3) determine whether the…”
In Re Birdwood Irr. Dist., Water Div. No. 1-A, 46 N.W.2d 884 (Neb. 1951). “§ 46-210, R. S. 1943. It appears, therefore, that the evidence will not sustain the department in canceling the water right appurtenant to Lots 1 and 2 in Section 9.”
Cent. Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 512 N.W.2d 392 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “This is a direct appeal by the State of Wyoming (Wyoming) pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-210 (Cum. Supp. 1992) from a July 2, 1992, order of Nebraska’s Director of Water Resources (Director), in which order the Director approved instream flow applications by Central Platte…”
In Re Application of the Ainsworth Irrigation Dist., 102 N.W.2d 429 (Neb. 1960). · cites it 2× “” In that connection, and contrary to defendants’ contention, we are cited no statute or authority, and we have found none, which limited the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Department of Water Resources with relation to plaintiff’s water rights and appropriation in the…”
Twin Platte Nat. Resources Dist. v. State, 390 N.W.2d 506 (Neb. 1986). “, whether the director was arbitrary or capricious in requiring, as a condition precedent to the consideration of the application, prior compliance with the Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act, and whether the provisions of that act apply to proposed withdrawal of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.