(1) A determination upon a claim filed pursuant to section 48-629 shall be made promptly by the department.
(2) A determination shall include a statement as to whether and in what amount claimant is entitled to benefits for the week with respect to which the determination is made. A determination with respect to the first week of a benefit year shall also include a statement as to whether the claimant has been paid the wages required under section 48-627.01, and, if so, the first day of the benefit year, his or her weekly benefit amount, and the maximum total amount of benefits payable to him or her with respect to such benefit year.
(3) In the event a claim is denied, a determination shall state the reasons therefor. Regardless of the outcome, the parties shall be promptly notified of the determination, together with the reasons therefor, and such determination shall be deemed to be the final decision on the claim, unless an appeal is filed with the department in the manner prescribed in section 48-634.
(4) Any benefits for which a claimant has been found eligible shall not be withheld because of an appeal filed under section 48-634, and such benefits shall be paid until a hearing officer has rendered a decision modifying or reversing the determination allowing such benefits if the claimant is otherwise eligible. Any benefits received by any person to which he or she had been found not entitled, under a redetermination or decision pursuant to sections 48-630 to 48-638, shall be treated as erroneous payments in accordance with section 48-665.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases, 1949–2000 · leading case:
Gilbert v. Hanlon, 335 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1983).
Gilbert v. Hanlon, 335 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1983).
· cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-630 (Reissue 1978). Gilbert’s weekly benefit was set at $106.”
Parson v. Chizek, 272 N.W.2d 48 (Neb. 1978).
“See § 48-630 et seq., R. R. S. 1943. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the plaintiff-claimant gave timely notice of appeal from the deputy’s determination.”
Beecham v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 36 N.W.2d 233 (Neb. 1949).
· cites it 3× “While from this language it would appear that the determination in these respects is to be made by the Commissioner of Labor, section 48-630, R. S. 1943, points out that the decision within these limits is to be made by a deputy designated by the commissioner.”
Ballard v. Giltner Pub. Schs., 492 N.W.2d 855 (Neb. 1992).
“However, § 48-636 of the Employment Security Law specifically provides : Except insofar as reconsideration of any determination is had under sections 48-630 to 48-632, any right, fact, or matter in issue, directly passed upon or necessarily involved in a determination or…”
Lancaster Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 0001 v. State, 615 N.W.2d 441 (Neb. 2000).
· cites it 2× “On September 4, 1998, the Department issued a deputy’s determination pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-630 (Reissue 1998), finding that Palmquist was entitled to a weekly benefit of $108 without disqualification because the separation from his employment with LPS “was due to a…”
Fauss v. Messerly, 263 N.W.2d 668 (Neb. 1978).
“§ 48-630, R. R. S. 1943. The right to appeal is conferred upon the “claimant or any other party entitled to notice of a determination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.