Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 77
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1827 (2026)

Real property taxes; redemption; persons with intellectual disability or mental disorder; time permitted

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The real property of persons with an intellectual disability or a mental disorder so sold, or any interest they may have in real property sold for taxes, may be redeemed at any time within five years after such sale.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C., 300 Neb. 825 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wisner v. Vandelay Invs., L.L.C., 300 Neb. 825 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 11× “1 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1827 (Cum. Supp. 2016).”
Nieveen v. TAX 106, 974 N.W.2d 15 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 29× “The district court denied Nieveen relief, finding that she did not qualify for an extended redemption period under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1827 (Reissue 2018) and that the tax certificate sale process did not violate her constitutional rights under the U.”
Wisner v. Vandelay Investments, 300 Neb. 825 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 16× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1827 (Reissue 2009) extends the redemption period for a mental disorder only if the owner had a mental disorder at the time of the property’s sale.”
Nieveen v. TAX 106, 317 Neb. 425 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 4× “First, she alleged that title should be quieted in her name because she suffered from a mental disorder and was therefore entitled to a 5-year redemption period under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1827 (Reissue 2018).”
Wisner v. Vandelay Investments (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “The complaint alleged that Gladys was entitled to recover the real property because Vandelay failed to comply with the notice and publication requirements relating to treasurer’s tax deeds; that Gladys was at all relevant times affected by a mental disorder and was entitled to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.