Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (2026)

Change in boundary lines; bonded indebtedness; treatment

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Bonded indebtedness approved by legal voters prior to any change in school district boundary lines pursuant to sections 79-413 to 79-421 shall remain the obligation of the school district voting such bonds unless otherwise specified in the petitions. When a district is dissolved by petitions and the area is attached to two or more districts, the petitions shall specify the disposition of assets and unbonded obligations of the original district.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1958–2007 · leading case: Rauert v. Sch. Dist. 1-r Hall Cnty., 555 N.W.2d 763 (Neb. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rauert v. Sch. Dist. 1-r Hall Cnty., 555 N.W.2d 763 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 11× “Rauert, as a taxpayer and resident of Hall County, filed a petition in this action, alleging violations of the Nebraska Budget Act, the Nebraska Public Meetings Law, and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (Reissue 1994), which requires that propositions for a special tax be submitted to…”

Nicholson v. Red Willow Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 0170, 699 N.W.2d 25 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 8× “She also sought a declaration that the reorganization petition and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (1) (Reissue 2003) are unconstitutional under Neb.”

Zyburo v. Bd. of Educ., 474 N.W.2d 671 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “In addition, transfers of territory could in the past and may now be transacted by the school board.”

State Ex Rel. Sch. Dist. v. Bd. of Equalization, 90 N.W.2d 421 (Neb. 1958). · cites it 12× “” It is provided by section 79-422, R. S. Supp., 1955, that whenever it shall be deemed necessary to erect a *789 schoolhouse or school buildings, or an addition or additions and improvements to any existing schoolhouse in any school district in this state, the school board or…”

Cumming v. Red Willow Sch. Dist. No. 179, 730 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 6× “Nicholson involved a claim for injunctive relief seeking to prevent the issuance of bonds and the implementation of the reorganization petition, and a declaration that the petition and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (1) (Reissue 2003) were unconstitutional under Neb.”

Cumming v. Red Willow Sch. Dist., 730 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 6× “Nicholson involved a claim for injunctive relief seeking to prevent the issuance of bonds and the implementation of the reorganization petition, and a declaration that the petition and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 79-422(1) (Reissue 2003) were unconstitutional under Neb.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422(1) — 3 cases

Nicholson v. Red Willow Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 0170, 699 N.W.2d 25 (Neb. 2005). “She also sought a declaration that the reorganization petition and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (1) (Reissue 2003) are unconstitutional under Neb.”

Cumming v. Red Willow Sch. Dist. No. 179, 730 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 2007). “Nicholson involved a claim for injunctive relief seeking to prevent the issuance of bonds and the implementation of the reorganization petition, and a declaration that the petition and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-422 (1) (Reissue 2003) were unconstitutional under Neb.”

Cumming v. Red Willow Sch. Dist., 730 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 2007). “Nicholson involved a claim for injunctive relief seeking to prevent the issuance of bonds and the implementation of the reorganization petition, and a declaration that the petition and Neb.Rev.Stat. § 79-422(1) (Reissue 2003) were unconstitutional under Neb.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.