Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-833 (2026)
Error proceedings; jurisdiction of court
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In error proceedings to reverse, vacate, or modify a final order by a school board made pursuant to sections 79-824 to 79-842, the school district, school board, or both may be named as defendants in error in the proceedings. The proceedings shall not be defeated and the court shall not be deprived of subject matter jurisdiction because the petitioner named the school board rather than the school district or the school district rather than the school board as the defendant in error.
This section shall apply to all error proceedings pending in the district court or the Supreme Court on June 11, 1991, and to error proceedings commenced after such date.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1998–2018 · leading case: Robinson v. Morrill Cty. Sch. Dist. 63, 299 Neb. 740 (Neb. 2018).
Robinson v. Morrill Cty. Sch. Dist. 63, 299 Neb. 740 (Neb. 2018). “4 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-833 (Reissue 2014). 5 See McQuinn v .”
McQuinn v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 66, 612 N.W.2d 198 (Neb. 2000). “In this regard, we note that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-833 (Reissue 1996) refers to “error proceedings to reverse, vacate, or modify a final order by a school board made pursuant to sections 79-824 to 79-842.”
Robinson v. Morrill Cty. Sch. Dist. 63, 299 Neb. 740 (Neb. 2018). “4 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-833 (Reissue 2014). - 748 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 299 Nebraska R eports ROBINSON v.”
Deborah Kramer v. Logan Cty. Sch. (8th Cir. 1998). “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 79-833 ; Schaffert v. Lancaster County Sch.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.