Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 84
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.03 (2026)

Hearing officer; prehearing conference and hearing; how conducted

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The hearing officer may conduct all or part of the prehearing conference and the hearing by telephone, television, or other electronic means if each participant in the conference or hearing has an opportunity to participate in, to hear, and, if technically feasible, to see the entire proceeding while it is taking place. This section does not apply to a prehearing conference or a hearing held under sections 60-498.01 to 60-498.04.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1998–2006 · leading case: Davis v. Wimes, 641 N.W.2d 37 (Neb. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Wimes, 641 N.W.2d 37 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 6× “§ 60-6 ,205(6)(a) (Reissue 1998); (2) finding that her license revocation hearing was held in accordance with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.03 (Reissue 1999); (3) finding that the department established sufficient foundation to receive the sworn report into evidence; and (4) finding…”
Gracey v. Zwonechek, 643 N.W.2d 381 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 7× “Janssen and Stetson each additionally assign that the district court erred in finding that their license revocation hearings were held in accordance with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.03 (Reissue 1999).”
Reiter v. Wimes, 640 N.W.2d 19 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 3× “Reiter claimed that because videoconferencing was available in Dawes County, the hearing officer should have ordered that videoconferencing be used pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.03 (Reissue 1999).”
Kimball v. Neb. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 586 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 5× “In this appeal, we must determine whether the Department may hold a telephonic hearing, as permitted by Neb.Rev.Stat. § 84-913.03 (Reissue 1994), when a formal "rules of evidence" hearing is requested by the driver.”
Muir v. Nebraska Dep't of Motor Vehs., 618 N.W.2d 444 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 4× “Section 84-913.03 provides for telephonic hearings.”
Robbins v. Neth, 722 N.W.2d 76 (Neb. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “Robbins' final assignment of error is that his ALR hearing was not conducted by videoconference, when conducting the hearing in such manner was technically feasible.”
Kimball v. Nebraska Dep't of Motor Vehs., 586 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 5× “In this appeal, we must determine whether the Department may hold a telephonic hearing, as permitted by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-913.03 (Reissue 1994), when a formal “rules of evidence” hearing is requested by the driver.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.