Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240
Legal recognition of electronic records, electronic signatures and electronic contracts
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 719.240 Legal recognition of electronic records, electronic signatures
and electronic contracts.
1. A record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.
2. A contract may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because an electronic record was used in its formation.
3. If a law requires a record to be in writing, an electronic record satisfies the law.
4. If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.
(Added to NRS by 2001, 2716)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2023–2025 · leading case: Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Industries Inc.
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated v. Elarja (2023)
“” NRS § 719.240(4); see, e.g., Gonzales v. Sitel Operating Corp.”
Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Industries Inc. (2023)
“4 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240 (“A 2 record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in 3 electronic form” and “[i]f a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.”
Broadnax v. Lyft, Inc. (2025)
“…11 U.S.C. § 7001 (a); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240 . 12 Broadnax also contends that he is exempt from the FAA because he is a “transportation 13 worker.” ECF No. 11 at 2. But the Ninth Circuit has held that rideshare drive”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 719.240(4) — 1 case
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated v. Elarja (2023)
“” NRS § 719.240(4); see, e.g., Gonzales v. Sitel Operating Corp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.