Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 89 - PROFESSIONAL ENTITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 89.220

Professional relationship preserved

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 89.220  Professional relationship preserved.  The provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of such professional service, but:

      1.  A member or employee of a professional association shall not be personally liable in tort for any act in which the member or employee has not personally participated.

      2.  A member or employee of a professional association shall not be personally liable in contract for any contract which the member or employee signs on behalf of a professional association within the limits of his or her actual authority.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 523; A 2003, 3161)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2016 · leading case: Fierle v. Perez
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fierle v. Perez (2009) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 89.220(1) provides that: The provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of such…”
Zhang, M.D. v. Barnes (2016) nev “060 and NRS 89.220, as interpreted in Fierle, a physician's professional corporation, equally with the physician himself, can be a "provider of healthcare" for purposes of the cap NRS 41A.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 89.220(1) — 1 case
Fierle v. Perez (2009) nev “NRS 89.220(1) provides that: The provisions of this chapter relating to professional associations do not modify any law applicable to the relationship between a person furnishing professional service and a person receiving such service, including liability arising out of such…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.