NRS
104.2602 Manner and effect of rightful rejection.
1. Rejection of goods must be within a
reasonable time after their delivery or tender. It is ineffective unless the
buyer seasonably notifies the seller.
2. Subject to the provisions of the two
following sections on rejected goods (NRS
104.2603 and 104.2604):
(a) After rejection any exercise of ownership by
the buyer with respect to any commercial unit is wrongful as against the
seller; and
(b) If the buyer has before rejection taken
physical possession of goods in which the buyer does not have a security
interest under the provisions of this Article (subsection 3 of NRS 104.2711), the buyer is under a duty
after rejection to hold them with reasonable care at the seller’s disposition
for a time sufficient to permit the seller to remove them; but
(c) The buyer has no further obligations with
regard to goods rightfully rejected.
3. The seller’s rights with respect to
goods wrongfully rejected are governed by the provisions of this Article on
seller’s remedies in general (NRS 104.2703).
(Added to NRS by 1965,
805)
Notes of Decisions
Sierra Diesel Injection Serv. v. Burroughs Corp., 651 F. Supp. 1371 (D. Nev. 1987).
· cites it 2× “NRS § 104.2602(2). In the present case, the defendant argues that the plaintiff’s attempt to revoke its acceptance of the B-80 unit was not made within a reasonable time, in that the revocation came some six years after the unit was installed.”
Hix v. Biomet Inc (D. Nev. 2022).
· cites it 2× “7 See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2602 (1). “[I]f, after acceptance of the goods, the buyer fail[s] to give 8 notice to the seller of the breach or any promise or warranty within a reasonable time after the buyer 9 knows, or ought to know, of such breach, the seller shall not be…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.2602(2) — 1 case
Sierra Diesel Injection Serv. v. Burroughs Corp., 651 F. Supp. 1371 (D. Nev. 1987).
“NRS § 104.2602(2). In the present case, the defendant argues that the plaintiff’s attempt to revoke its acceptance of the B-80 unit was not made within a reasonable time, in that the revocation came some six years after the unit was installed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.