Nev. Rev. Stat. § 104.9201

General effectiveness of security agreement

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 104.9201  General effectiveness of security agreement.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, a security agreement is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the collateral, and against creditors.

      2.  A transaction subject to this article is subject to any applicable rule of law which establishes a different rule for consumers and to chapters 97 and 97A of NRS.

      3.  In case of conflict between this article and a rule of law, statute or regulation described in subsection 2, the rule of law, statute or regulation controls. Failure to comply with a statute or regulation described in subsection 2 has only the effect the statute or regulation specifies.

      4.  This article does not:

      (a) Validate any rate, charge, agreement, or practice that violates a rule of law, statute or regulation described in subsection 2; or

      (b) Extend the application of the rule of law, statute or regulation to a transaction not otherwise subject to it.

      (Added to NRS by 1999, 295)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1974–1989 · leading case: May v. G.M.B., Inc.
May v. G.M.B., Inc. (1989) nev · cites it 4× “UCC Article 9’s so called “golden rule,” White & Summers § 25-12, is found in NRS 104.9201, which, in pertinent part, provides: Except as otherwise provided in this chapter a security agreement is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the…”
NEVADA R. & S. CO. v. United States Dept. of Treasury IRS (1974) nvd · cites it 2× “See NRS § 104.9201; United States v. Lebanon Woolen Mills Corp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.