Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 107 - DEEDS OF TRUST
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.300 (2026)

Penalty for failure to deliver statement; bar to recovery of certain damages

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 107.300  Penalty for failure to deliver statement; bar to recovery of certain damages.

      1.  A beneficiary who willfully fails to deliver a statement requested pursuant to NRS 107.200 or 107.210 within 21 days after it is requested is liable to the person who requested the statement in an amount of $300 and any actual damages suffered by the person who requested the statement.

      2.  A judgment awarded to a person who requested a statement pursuant to NRS 107.200 or 107.210 for failure to deliver a statement bars recovery of damages for any other failure to deliver that statement pursuant to a demand made within 6 months before or after the demand for which the judgment was awarded.

      3.  As used in this section, “willfully” means an intentional failure to comply with the requirements of NRS 107.200 or 107.210 without just cause.

      (Added to NRS by 1995, 1521)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2022–2024 · leading case: SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 9× “SFR also argues that this claim asserts that not all statutorily 23 required information was provided in the statement.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 9× “SFR also argues that it has alleged that not all statutorily required 17 information was provided in the statement, so Nationstar violated the statute in ways other than 18 failing to provide the note.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 9× “SFR also argues that Nationstar did not respond at all, so it has violated 16 the statute in ways other than failing to provide the note.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Bank Of Am., N.A. (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 8× “210 are codified in NRS § 107.300. NRS § 107.300 provides that “[a] beneficiary who 7 willfully fails to deliver a statement requested pursuant to NRS 107.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC (D. Nev. 2023). · cites it 8× “) SFR counters that NRS § 107.300 provides the 28 2 agrees with Nationstar.”
POS Investements, LLC v. Citimortgage, Inc. (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 8× “” 28 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.300 (3). 1 The Court finds Plaintiff has failed to plead sufficient facts to establish Citi willfully failed 2 to comply with NRS 107.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 4× “260 because § 107.300 provides a cause of action only for 5 violations of §§ 107.”
Valencia Mgmt. LLC Series 4 v. NewRez LLC (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 4× “7 However, I grant Valencia leave to amend to assert a claim under NRS § 107.300 8|| because it is not clear that amendment would be futile.”
SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC (D. Nev. 2022). · cites it 3× “Under § 107.300(1), a deed of trust beneficiary “who willfully fails to 22 23 1 The defendants do not contest that SFR falls within the statute’s definition of a person authorized to request a statement.”
SFR Inv. Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2023). · cites it 3× “It 14 provides a private right of action for damages against any “beneficiary who willfully fails to 15 deliver a statement requested pursuant to NRS 107.”
RH Kids, LLC v. Nat'l Default Servicing Corp. (D. Nev. 2023). · cites it 3× “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.300 . A violation of NRS 107.”
SFR Inv. Pool 1, LLC v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n (D. Nev. 2024). · cites it 3× “NRS 107.300. Nothing in the statutory language extends liability to any other 9 entity, including a successor in interest.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.300(1) — 6 cases
Valencia Mgmt. LLC Series 4 v. NewRez LLC (D. Nev. 2022). “7 However, I grant Valencia leave to amend to assert a claim under NRS § 107.300 8|| because it is not clear that amendment would be futile.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “260 because § 107.300 provides a cause of action only for 5 violations of §§ 107.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that this claim asserts that not all statutorily 23 required information was provided in the statement.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that it has alleged that not all statutorily required 17 information was provided in the statement, so Nationstar violated the statute in ways other than 18 failing to provide the note.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that Nationstar did not respond at all, so it has violated 16 the statute in ways other than failing to provide the note.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.300(3) — 6 cases
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “260 because § 107.300 provides a cause of action only for 5 violations of §§ 107.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC, dba Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that this claim asserts that not all statutorily 23 required information was provided in the statement.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that it has alleged that not all statutorily required 17 information was provided in the statement, so Nationstar violated the statute in ways other than 18 failing to provide the note.”
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper (D. Nev. 2022). “SFR also argues that Nationstar did not respond at all, so it has violated 16 the statute in ways other than failing to provide the note.”
SFR Investments Pool 1 LLC v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC (D. Nev. 2022). “Under § 107.300(1), a deed of trust beneficiary “who willfully fails to 22 23 1 The defendants do not contest that SFR falls within the statute’s definition of a person authorized to request a statement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.