Nev. Rev. Stat. § 108.238
Right to maintain civil action or submit controversy to arbitration not impaired
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 108.238 Right to maintain civil action or submit controversy to
arbitration not impaired. The
provisions of NRS 108.221 to 108.246, inclusive, must not be construed
to impair or affect the right of a lien claimant to whom any debt may be due
for work, materials or equipment furnished to maintain a civil action to
recover that debt against the person liable therefor or to submit any
controversy arising under a contract to arbitration to recover that amount.
(Added to NRS by 1965, 1165; A 2003, 2608)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1969–2021 · leading case: Day & Night Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Day & Night Manufacturing Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (1969)
“First, NRS 108.238 [2] preserves the right of any person to whom any debt may be due for work done or material furnished to maintain a personal action to recover such debt against the person liable therefor.”
Lane-Tahoe, Inc. v. Kindred Construction Company (1975)
“" With regard to the McKenzie controversy, it is urged that the quoted language bars arbitration since Lane-Tahoe did not file its motion to compel arbitration until more than six months after *495 McKenzie had recorded its claim of lien. [3] It is Lane-Tahoe's position that the…”
Fisher Brothers, Inc. v. Harrah Realty Co. (1976)
“NRS 108.238 provides that the mere existence of the mechanic’s lien statutes should not be construed to preclude anyone from maintaining an independent action to recover a debt resulting from “work done or material furnished” against the person liable therefore.”
Nevada National Bank v. Snyder (1992)
“NRS 108.238 provides: Right to maintain personal action for debt not impaired.”
KORTE CONSTR. CO. VS. STATE, BD. OF REGENTS (2021)
“" NRS 108.238. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 101 I947A 441DP .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.