Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125A.605 (2026)

Application and construction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125A.605  Application and construction.  In applying and construing the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.

      (Added to NRS by 2003, 1004)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: Friedman v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Clark, 264 P.3d 1161 (Nev. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Friedman v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Clark, 264 P.3d 1161 (Nev. 2011). · cites it 2× “See NRS 125A.605 ("In applying and construing the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
Kragen v. Dist. Ct. (kragen), 140 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 49 (Nev. 2024). “See NRS 125A.605; see also Kemp v. Turqueza, No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.