NRS
128.014 “Neglected child” defined. “Neglected
child” includes a child:
1. Who lacks the proper parental care by
reason of the fault or habits of his or her parent, guardian or custodian;
2. Whose parent, guardian or custodian
neglects or refuses to provide proper or necessary subsistence, education,
medical or surgical care, or other care necessary for the child’s health,
morals or well-being;
3. Whose parent, guardian or custodian
neglects or refuses to provide the special care made necessary by the child’s
physical or mental condition;
4. Who is found in a disreputable place,
or who is permitted to associate with vagrants or vicious or immoral persons;
or
5. Who engages or is in a situation
dangerous to life or limb, or injurious to health or morals of the child or
others,
Ê and the
parent’s neglect need not be willful.
(Added to NRS by 1975,
964; A 1981,
1753)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
26
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case:
Chapman v. Chapman, 607 P.2d 1141 (Nev. 1980).
Chapman v. Chapman, 607 P.2d 1141 (Nev. 1980).
· cites it 2× “NRS 128.014 defines a neglected child. 3 As we read the statute, a finding of neglect must be based upon the treatment of the child while the parent has custody: neglect is not established when the child is left by the parent in an environment where the child is known to be…”
Matter of Parental Rights as to Bow, 930 P.2d 1128 (Nev. 1997).
· cites it 2× “The State claimed that under NRS 128.014 Recodo had neglected Michael by failing to provide him with such things as proper parental care, necessary subsistence, education, and medical care.”
Champagne v. Welfare Div. Of Nev. State Dept., 691 P.2d 849 (Nev. 1984).
“” NRS 128.014. Although it is difficult to define “proper,” it is probably true that all parents are at one time or another guilty of neglecting to give their children “proper” care.”
Dawn M. v. Nevada State Div. of Child & Fam. Servs., 221 P.3d 1255 (Nev. 2009).
“” NRS 128.014(2). NRS 128.106(4) provides that when determining neglect, the court shall consider whether excessive drug and alcohol use interfered with the parent’s ability to care for the child.”
Matter of Parental Rights as to DRH, 92 P.3d 1230 (Nev. 2004).
“106(4) provides that "[e]xcessive use of intoxicating liquors, controlled substances or dangerous drugs which renders the parent consistently unable to care for the child," is one such factor.”
McGuire v. Welfare Div. of State Dep't of Human Resources, 697 P.2d 479 (Nev. 1985).
“On appeal, Karen asserts that the State failed to present clear and convincing evidence at trial to demonstrate that Lorenda was a “neglected child” pursuant to the definition of that term as set forth in NRS 128.014(1) and (2). This statute reads in pertinent part: “Neglected…”
In Re Nj, 221 P.3d 1255 (Nev. 2009).
“" NRS 128.014(2). NRS 128.106(4) provides that when determining neglect, the court shall consider whether excessive drug and alcohol use interfered with the parent's ability to care for the child.”
In Re: Parental Rights as to S.A.T. (Fam.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 46 (Nev. 2025).
· cites it 2× “” NRS 128.014(1)-(2). We have held that “a finding of neglect must be based upon the treatment of the child while the parent has custody: neglect is not established when the child is left by the parent in an environment where the child is known to be receiving proper care.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 128.014(1) — 9 cases
McGuire v. Welfare Div. of State Dep't of Human Resources, 697 P.2d 479 (Nev. 1985).
“On appeal, Karen asserts that the State failed to present clear and convincing evidence at trial to demonstrate that Lorenda was a “neglected child” pursuant to the definition of that term as set forth in NRS 128.014(1) and (2). This statute reads in pertinent part: “Neglected…”
In Re: Parental Rights as to S.A.T. (Fam.), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 46 (Nev. 2025).
“” NRS 128.014(1)-(2). We have held that “a finding of neglect must be based upon the treatment of the child while the parent has custody: neglect is not established when the child is left by the parent in an environment where the child is known to be receiving proper care.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 128.014(2) — 4 cases
Dawn M. v. Nevada State Div. of Child & Fam. Servs., 221 P.3d 1255 (Nev. 2009).
“” NRS 128.014(2). NRS 128.106(4) provides that when determining neglect, the court shall consider whether excessive drug and alcohol use interfered with the parent’s ability to care for the child.”
In Re Nj, 221 P.3d 1255 (Nev. 2009).
“" NRS 128.014(2). NRS 128.106(4) provides that when determining neglect, the court shall consider whether excessive drug and alcohol use interfered with the parent's ability to care for the child.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 128.014(3) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.