Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 176 - JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105

Judgment in criminal action generally

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176.105  Judgment in criminal action generally.

      1.  If a defendant is found guilty and is sentenced as provided by law, the judgment of conviction must set forth:

      (a) The plea;

      (b) The verdict or finding;

      (c) The adjudication and sentence, including the date of the sentence, any term of imprisonment, the amount and terms of any fine, restitution or administrative assessment, a reference to the statute under which the defendant is sentenced and, if necessary to determine eligibility for parole, the applicable provision of the statute; and

      (d) The exact amount of credit granted for time spent in confinement before conviction, if any.

      2.  If the defendant is found not guilty, or for any other reason is entitled to be discharged, judgment must be entered accordingly.

      3.  The judgment must be signed by the judge and entered by the clerk.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1433; A 1973, 161; 1979, 1124; 1989, 938; 1993, 78; 1997, 905)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1970–2025 · leading case: Ledbetter v. State
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ledbetter v. State (2006) nev · cites it 4× “[25] See NRS 176.105(1). [26] See NRS 176.105(3). [27] See 1997 Nev.”
Miller v. Hayes (1979) nev · cites it 6× “Only after a judgment of conviction is "signed by the judge and entered by the clerk," as provided by NRS 176.105, does it become final and does the defendant begin to serve a sentence of imprisonment.”
Whitehead v. State (2012) nev · cites it 4× “Whitehead contends that the panel overlooked NRS 176.105(1) and whether a judgment of conviction that imposes restitution but leaves the amount of restitution to be determined is final for purposes of triggering the one-year period under NRS 34.”
Griffin v. State (2006) nev · cites it 3× “See NRS 176.105(1)(d) (providing that the judgment of conviction must set forth “[t]he exact amount of credit granted for time spent in confinement before conviction, if any”).”
WITTER (WILLIAM) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT) (2019) nev · cites it 4× “3d 1170, 1171 (2013) ("None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1).). That question is significant in at least two respects: the defendant's right to appeal from a "final judgment" under NRS 177.”
Slaatte v. State (2013) nev · cites it 3× “None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1). If such a judgment is not appealable as a final judgment, see NRS 177.”
Bradley v. State (1993) nev · cites it 3× “Bradley references NRS 176.105 to buttress his position that a sentence is “pronounced” at the sentencing hearing and is simply memorialized by the subsequent written judgment of conviction.”
Attaguile v. State (2006) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 176.105(1)(c). See Bradley v. State, 109 Nev.”
Jones v. State (1989) nev · cites it 3× “Appellant first contends that the district court improperly sentenced him to an enhanced term because the evidence presented below of his prior California DUI convictions was legally insufficient to establish “convictions” as defined by NRS 176.105 and *126 NRS 484.3792(2). 1 We…”
Nelson v. State (2007) nev “Nelson’s remaining arguments on appeal similarly lack merit, and we therefore affirm the district court’s judgment of con *552 viction.”
State v. Eighth Judicial District Court (1984) nev · cites it 2× “Absent constitutional error, however, a district court is without jurisdiction to suspend the sentence of a defendant after a judgment of conviction has been signed by the judge and entered by the clerk pursuant to NRS 176.105. Miller v. Hayes, 95 Nev. 927 , 604 P.”
Revuelta v. State (1970) nev · cites it 3× “NRS 176.105. 1 We agree. The source of NRS 176.”
Show all 45 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(1) — 7 cases
Ledbetter v. State (2006) nev “[25] See NRS 176.105(1). [26] See NRS 176.105(3). [27] See 1997 Nev.”
Whitehead v. State (2012) nev “Whitehead contends that the panel overlooked NRS 176.105(1) and whether a judgment of conviction that imposes restitution but leaves the amount of restitution to be determined is final for purposes of triggering the one-year period under NRS 34.”
WITTER (WILLIAM) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT) (2019) nev “3d 1170, 1171 (2013) ("None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1).). That question is significant in at least two respects: the defendant's right to appeal from a "final judgment" under NRS 177.”
Slaatte v. State (2013) nev “None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1). If such a judgment is not appealable as a final judgment, see NRS 177.”
JOHNSON (DONTE) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-PC) (2017) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(1)(b) — 1 case
Voss v. Russell (2025) nvd
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(1)(c) — 19 cases
Slaatte v. State (2013) nev “None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1). If such a judgment is not appealable as a final judgment, see NRS 177.”
WITTER (WILLIAM) VS. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT) (2019) nev “3d 1170, 1171 (2013) ("None of our prior decisions addressed whether the judgment was final given its failure to comply with NRS 176.105(1).). That question is significant in at least two respects: the defendant's right to appeal from a "final judgment" under NRS 177.”
Attaguile v. State (2006) nev “NRS 176.105(1)(c). See Bradley v. State, 109 Nev.”
Urmston (Gregory) v. State C/W 74620/74621 (2019) nev
Urmston (Gregory) v. State C/W 74620/74621 (2019) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(1)(d) — 1 case
Griffin v. State (2006) nev “See NRS 176.105(1)(d) (providing that the judgment of conviction must set forth “[t]he exact amount of credit granted for time spent in confinement before conviction, if any”).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(2) — 1 case
Davis (Dedrick) v. State (2013) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(3) — 6 cases
Ledbetter v. State (2006) nev “[25] See NRS 176.105(1). [26] See NRS 176.105(3). [27] See 1997 Nev.”
Attaguile v. State (2006) nev “NRS 176.105(1)(c). See Bradley v. State, 109 Nev.”
Jones v. State (1989) nev “Appellant first contends that the district court improperly sentenced him to an enhanced term because the evidence presented below of his prior California DUI convictions was legally insufficient to establish “convictions” as defined by NRS 176.105 and *126 NRS 484.3792(2). 1 We…”
Reynolds (Scott) v. State (2018) nev
Reynolds v. State (2018) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176.105(l)(b) — 1 case
Jones v. State (1989) nev “Appellant first contends that the district court improperly sentenced him to an enhanced term because the evidence presented below of his prior California DUI convictions was legally insufficient to establish “convictions” as defined by NRS 176.105 and *126 NRS 484.3792(2). 1 We…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.