Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 18 - COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.050

Discretion of court in allowing costs

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 18.050  Discretion of court in allowing costs.  Except as limited by this section, in other actions in the district court, part or all of the prevailing party’s costs may be allowed and may be apportioned between the parties, or on the same or adverse sides. If, in the judgment of the court, the plaintiff believes he or she was justified in bringing the action in the district court, and the plaintiff recovers at least $700 in money or damages, or personal property of that value, the court may allow the plaintiff part or all of his or her costs.

      [1911 CPA § 438; RL § 5380; NCL § 8927]—(NRS A 1977, 775; 1979, 1726; 1981, 174, 470)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Wilmington Trust Co. (2006) nev “020 or NRS 18.050 was proper. I would reverse the dis *187 trict court’s order on reconsideration holding that NRS 108.”
Palace Station Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. Jones (1999) nev · cites it 2× “010 and NRS 18.050. On March 22, 1995, Palace Station filed a reply in support of its motion for attorney’s fees and costs.”
Campbell v. Campbell (1985) nev “Costs are awarded as a matter of course to the prevailing party in all actions listed in NRS 18.”
National Tow & Road Service, Inc. v. Integrity Insurance (1986) nev “Therefore, under NRS 18.050, costs are within the discretion of the court.”
Flangas v. State (1981) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 18.050 sets forth additional rules by which a litigant may recover some or all of his expenses.”
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC VS. TJ ALLEN, LLC (2016) nev · cites it 9× “NRS 18.050. Under either statute, a party must prevail before it may win an award of costs.”
S. Nev. Adult Mental Health Servs. Vs. Brown (2021) nev · cites it 4× “020(3) and NRS 18.050, to be a "prevailing party," that party "must win on at least one of [his] claime).”
GOLIGHTLY & VANNAH, PLLC VS. TJ ALLEN, LLC (2016) nev · cites it 3× “NRS 18.050. Under either statute, a party must prevail before it may win an award of costs.”
THE CADLE CO. VS. WOODS & ERICKSON C/W 63790 (2015) nev · cites it 2× “020 and NRS 18.050 give district courts wide, but not unlimited, discretion to award costs to prevailing parties.”
Parks! America, Inc. v. Harper (2016) nev “020 and NRS 18.050. In particular, the $12,633.79 awarded for in- SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 10) 1947A house litigation costs was based on respondents' estimate, arrived at by calculating 2.”
Frazier v. Drake (2015) nev “16 We emphasize that not all of these factors may be pertinent to every request for expert witness fees in excess of $1,500 per expert under NRS 18.050(5), and thus, the resolution of such requests will necessarily require a case-by-case examination of appropriate factors.”
FRAZIER VS. DRAKE (2015) nev “16 We emphasize that not all of these factors may be pertinent to every request for expert witness fees in excess of $1,500 per expert under NRS 18.050(5), and thus, the resolution of such requests will necessarily require a case-by-case examination of appropriate factors.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.050(5) — 4 cases
Frazier v. Drake (2015) nev “16 We emphasize that not all of these factors may be pertinent to every request for expert witness fees in excess of $1,500 per expert under NRS 18.050(5), and thus, the resolution of such requests will necessarily require a case-by-case examination of appropriate factors.”
FRAZIER VS. DRAKE (2015) nev “16 We emphasize that not all of these factors may be pertinent to every request for expert witness fees in excess of $1,500 per expert under NRS 18.050(5), and thus, the resolution of such requests will necessarily require a case-by-case examination of appropriate factors.”
FRAZIER VS. DRAKE (2015) nev
Frazier v. Drake (2015) nevapp
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.