Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 18 - COSTS AND DISBURSEMENTS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.060

Costs of appeal to Court of Appeals or Supreme Court; discretion of court

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 18.060  Costs of appeal to Court of Appeals or Supreme Court; discretion of court.  In the following cases the costs of an appeal to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court shall be in the discretion of the court:

      1.  Where a new trial is ordered.

      2.  When a judgment is modified.

Ê In the event no order is made by the court relative to the costs in the two instances mentioned in this section, the party obtaining any relief shall have his or her costs.

      [1911 CPA § 439; RL § 5381; NCL § 8928]—(NRS A 2013, 1732)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1971–2022 · leading case: Hardison v. Carmany
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hardison v. Carmany (1972) nev · cites it 5× “We further order that in accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed his costs of this appeal, upon timely filing of a proper cost bill with the clerk of this court, those costs to be paid to appellant at the same time remittance is made for costs incurred in the lower…”
Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown (1975) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed its costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.”
Turner v. Saka (1974) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060, appellants are allowed their costs on appeal, upon proper filing of a cost bill.”
Daugherty v. WABASH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (1971) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060, appellant is allowed her costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.”
Eikelberger v. Tolotti (1974) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060, appellants may claim their costs in this court by timely filing of a proper cost bill.”
Chesler v. Chesler (1971) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060, appellant is allowed her costs on appeal, upon proper filing of a cost bill.”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow C/W 82245 (2022) nev · cites it 6× “82803, we conclude that the district court did not err because neither NRS 18.060 nor NRAP 39 allow an award of costs to a prevailing party in an original proceeding for writ relief.”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow (Child Custody) (2022) nev · cites it 6× “82803, we conclude that the district court did not err because neither NRS 18.060 nor NRAP 39 allow an award of costs to a prevailing party in an original proceeding for writ relief.”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow C/W 82245 (2022) nev · cites it 3× “82803, we conclude that the district court did not err because neither NRS 18.060 nor NRAP 39 allow an award of costs to a prevailing party in an original proceeding for writ relief.”
Washington v. Aa Primo Builders, LLC (2019) nev “After AA Primo's unsuccessful appeal from the order granting their JMOL, the Washingtons moved for additional fees and costs under NRS 18.060. When AA Primo did not oppose that motion, the Washingtons filed a "supplement" requesting that AA Primo's counsel, Becky Pintar, be held…”
Washington v. Aa Primo Builders, LLC (2019) nev “After AA Primo's unsuccessful appeal from the order granting their JMOL, the Washingtons moved for additional fees and costs under NRS 18.060. When AA Primo did not oppose that motion, the Washingtons filed a "supplement" requesting that AA Primo's counsel, Becky Pintar, be held…”
Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen (1976) nev “In accord with NRS 18.060 appellant will be allowed its costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.060(2) — 1 case
Hardison v. Carmany (1972) nev “We further order that in accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed his costs of this appeal, upon timely filing of a proper cost bill with the clerk of this court, those costs to be paid to appellant at the same time remittance is made for costs incurred in the lower…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 18.060(4) — 1 case
Hardison v. Carmany (1972) nev “We further order that in accord with NRS 18.060, appellant will be allowed his costs of this appeal, upon timely filing of a proper cost bill with the clerk of this court, those costs to be paid to appellant at the same time remittance is made for costs incurred in the lower…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.