Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 2 - SUPREME COURT
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 2.110 (2026)

Power on appeal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 2.110  Power on appeal.  The Supreme Court may reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or order appealed from as to any or all of the parties, and may, if necessary, order a new trial, and in a criminal action, order the new trial to be had in the proper place. On a direct appeal from an order in a civil action granting a motion to change the place of trial of an action or refusing to change the place of trial, the Court may affirm or reverse the order and order the trial to be had in the proper place. An order in a civil action changing or refusing to change the place of trial must not be appealed from on an appeal from a judgment, but only on direct appeal from the order changing or refusing to change the place of trial. When the judgment or order appealed from is reversed or modified, this Court may make, or direct the inferior court to make, complete restoration of all property and rights lost by the erroneous judgment or order.

      [8:19:1865; A 1913, 274; 1919 RL § 4835; NCL § 8377]—(NRS A 1981, 1706)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1963–1980 · leading case: Rice v. Clark Cnty., 382 P.2d 605 (Nev. 1963).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rice v. Clark Cnty., 382 P.2d 605 (Nev. 1963). · cites it 2× “The power of this court on appeal is governed by NRS 2.110 reading: "Power of court on appeal.”
Bonacci v. State, 620 P.2d 1244 (Nev. 1980). · cites it 2× “NRS 2.110 provides in pertinent part: “An order changing or refusing to change the place of trial shall not be appealed from on an appeal from a judgment, but only on direct appeal from the order changing or refusing to change the place of trial.”
Anderson v. State, 477 P.2d 595 (Nev. 1970). · cites it 2× “NRS 2.110 provides in part: “An order changing or refusing to change the place of trial shall not be appealed from on an appeal from a judgment, but only on direct appeal from the order changing or refusing to change the place of trial.”
Hanley v. Zenoff, 398 P.2d 241 (Nev. 1965). · cites it 2× “The issues presented thereby are *13 whether in a criminal action an appeal lies from an order denying a motion for change of venue and, if so, does the trial court, upon the filing of the notice of appeal thereupon, lose jurisdiction to proceed with the trial pending the…”
Hansen v. Edwards, 426 P.2d 792 (Nev. 1967). “NOTES [1] NRS 2.110. "This court may reverse, affirm or modify the judgment or order appealed from * * *.”
Sanchez v. Alonso, 615 P.2d 934 (Nev. 1980). “NRS 2.110. 2. Award of Attorney’s Fees. Because the jury only allowed $91,662.”
Hanley v. State, 391 P.2d 865 (Nev. 1964). “Whether his delay in seeking review of the venue question contravened NRS 2.110 was not presented to the court for determination.”
Maheu v. Hughes Tool Co., 503 P.2d 4 (Nev. 1972). ““IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants and each of them forthwith notify their respective agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons in active concert and participation with them, including all persons to whom any original or copy of any of the said books,.”
Ash Springs Dev. Corp. v. Crunk, 589 P.2d 1023 (Nev. 1979). “NRS 2.110. Respondents, in their opposition to the demand suggested that NRS 13.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.