NRS
200.364 Definitions. As
used in
NRS 200.364 to
200.3788, inclusive, unless the context
otherwise requires:
1. “Forensic laboratory” has the meaning
ascribed to it in NRS 176.09117.
2. “Forensic medical examination” has the
meaning ascribed to it in NRS 217.300.
3. “Genetic marker analysis” has the
meaning ascribed to it in NRS 176.09118.
4. “Offense involving a pupil or child”
means any of the following offenses:
(a) Sexual conduct between certain employees of a
school or volunteers at a school and a pupil pursuant to NRS 201.540.
(b) Sexual conduct between certain employees of a
college or university and a student pursuant to NRS 201.550.
(c) Sexual conduct between certain employees or
contractors of or volunteers for an entity which provides services to children
and a person under the care, custody, control or supervision of the entity
pursuant to NRS 201.555.
5. “Perpetrator” means a person who
commits a sexual offense, an offense involving a pupil or child or sex trafficking.
6. “Sex trafficking” means a violation of
subsection 2 of NRS 201.300.
7. “Sexual assault forensic evidence kit”
means the forensic evidence obtained from a forensic medical examination.
8. “Sexual offense” means any of the
following offenses:
(a) Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366.
(b) Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368.
9. “Sexual penetration” means cunnilingus,
fellatio, or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person’s body or
any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal
openings of the body of another, including sexual intercourse in its ordinary
meaning. The term does not include any such conduct for medical purposes.
10. “Statutory sexual seduction” means
ordinary sexual intercourse, anal intercourse or sexual penetration committed by
a person 18 years of age or older with a person who is 14 or 15 years of age
and who is at least 4 years younger than the perpetrator.
11. “Victim” means a person who is a
victim of a sexual offense, an offense involving a pupil or child or sex trafficking.
12. “Victim of sexual assault” has the
meaning ascribed to it in NRS 217.280.
(Added to NRS by 1977,
1626; A 1979,
572; 1991,
801; 1995,
700; 2009,
231, 1296;
2013,
2426; 2015,
2234; 2017,
2316, 2887,
2888)
Notes of Decisions
Slobodian v. State (1991)
nev · cites it 16×
“The victim testified repeatedly that she did not consent to the acts and that when she told Slobodian "no" he choked her with his hands.”
LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE (2020)
nev · cites it 4×
“426, § 34, at 2427 (defining "[s] tatutory sexual seduction," codified at NRS 200.364, in terms of sexual conduct with a person under 16 years of age).”
Crowley v. State (2004)
nev · cites it 2×
“366, as "cunnilingus, fellatio, or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person's body or any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal openings of the body of another, including sexual intercourse in its ordinary meaning.”
Doyle v. State (1996)
nev · cites it 2×
“" NRS 200.364(2). [5] At least one court has held that a defendant's claim that the state failed to establish whether sexual penetration occurred prior to or after the death of the victim was not preserved for appellate review where defendant's objection at trial was, like…”
Rosky v. State (2005)
nev
“See NRS 200.364; NRS 200.368. Rosky did not testify at trial.”
Jenkins v. State (1994)
nev · cites it 3×
“The statutes under which Jenkins was convicted, NRS 200.364 and 200.368, provide, in pertinent part, as follows: NRS 200.”
Robinson v. State (1994)
nev · cites it 7×
“To consider Robinson as an adult “in the eyes of the law” and as a person who is competent to violate the sexual seduction statute is reasonable and does no violence to the meaning of the statute.”
Husney v. O'DONNELL (1979)
nev · cites it 6×
“The indictment here in issue listed the relevant statutes regarding sexual seduction, *232 NRS 200.364, NRS 200.368, stated that it was an indictment for statutory sexual seduction, and alleged the specific instances of fellatio and cunnilingus.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(10) — 4 cases
LOFTHOUSE (JASON) VS. STATE (2020)
nev
“426, § 34, at 2427 (defining "[s] tatutory sexual seduction," codified at NRS 200.364, in terms of sexual conduct with a person under 16 years of age).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(2) — 10 cases
Crowley v. State (2004)
nev
“366, as "cunnilingus, fellatio, or any intrusion, however slight, of any part of a person's body or any object manipulated or inserted by a person into the genital or anal openings of the body of another, including sexual intercourse in its ordinary meaning.”
Doyle v. State (1996)
nev
“" NRS 200.364(2). [5] At least one court has held that a defendant's claim that the state failed to establish whether sexual penetration occurred prior to or after the death of the victim was not preserved for appellate review where defendant's objection at trial was, like…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(3) — 6 cases
Slobodian v. State (1991)
nev
“The victim testified repeatedly that she did not consent to the acts and that when she told Slobodian "no" he choked her with his hands.”
Robinson v. State (1994)
nev
“To consider Robinson as an adult “in the eyes of the law” and as a person who is competent to violate the sexual seduction statute is reasonable and does no violence to the meaning of the statute.”
Husney v. O'DONNELL (1979)
nev
“The indictment here in issue listed the relevant statutes regarding sexual seduction, *232 NRS 200.364, NRS 200.368, stated that it was an indictment for statutory sexual seduction, and alleged the specific instances of fellatio and cunnilingus.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(3)(b) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(4) — 1 case
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(5) — 7 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(5)(a) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(5)(b) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(6) — 2 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(6)(b) — 4 cases
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.364(9) — 10 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.