Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.750

Penalties

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 200.750  Penalties.  A person punishable pursuant to NRS 200.710 or 200.720 shall be punished for a category A felony by imprisonment in the state prison:

      1.  If the minor is 14 years of age or older, for life with the possibility of parole, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 5 years has been served, and shall be further punished by a fine of not more than $100,000.

      2.  If the minor is less than 14 years of age, for life with the possibility of parole, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 10 years has been served, and shall be further punished by a fine of not more than $100,000.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 815; A 1995, 1196; 1997, 1721; 2005, 2876)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Wilson v. State
Wilson v. State (2005) nev · cites it 2× “A person who knowingly uses, encourages, entices or permits a minor to simulate or engage in or assist others to simulate or engage in sexual conduct to produce a performance is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 200.750. 2. A person who…”
SENA (CHRISTOPHER) v. STATE (2022) nev · cites it 4× “A person who knowingly uses, encourages, entices or permits a minor to simulate or engage in or assist others to simulate or engage in sexual conduct to produce a performance is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 200.750. 2. A person who…”
Morrison v. State (2024) nevapp · cites it 7× “710(1) provides that "[a] person who knowingly uses, encourages, entices or permits a minor to simulate or engage in or assist others to simulate or engage in sexual conduct to produce a performance is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS…”
Williams (Patrick) v. State (2017) nev · cites it 2× “Williams pleaded guilty to the one• count of promotion of sexual performance of a minor in exchange for the State's agreement to follow the sentencing guidelines of NRS 200.750(1) instead of NRS 200.750(2).”
Sprowson, Jr. (Melvyn) v. State (2019) nev · cites it 2× “A person who knowingly uses, encourages, entices or permits a minor to simulate or engage in or assist others to simulate or engage in sexual conduct to produce a performance is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 200.750. 2. A person who…”
Fluckiger (Jeffery) Vs. State (2020) nev “730 (possession of a visual presentation depicting sexual conduct of person under 16 penalties); NRS 200.750 (punishment for a category A felony); NRS 201.”
Shue (Joshua) Vs. Warden (2020) nev “730(1); NRS 200.750(1), (2). Finally, NRS 176.0931(1) (lifetime supervision) explicitly provides that it shall be imposed "in addition to any other penalties provided by law," NRS 176.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.750(1) — 2 cases
Williams (Patrick) v. State (2017) nev “Williams pleaded guilty to the one• count of promotion of sexual performance of a minor in exchange for the State's agreement to follow the sentencing guidelines of NRS 200.750(1) instead of NRS 200.750(2).”
Shue (Joshua) Vs. Warden (2020) nev “730(1); NRS 200.750(1), (2). Finally, NRS 176.0931(1) (lifetime supervision) explicitly provides that it shall be imposed "in addition to any other penalties provided by law," NRS 176.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.750(2) — 2 cases
Morrison v. State (2024) nevapp “710(1) provides that "[a] person who knowingly uses, encourages, entices or permits a minor to simulate or engage in or assist others to simulate or engage in sexual conduct to produce a performance is guilty of a category A felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS…”
Williams (Patrick) v. State (2017) nev “Williams pleaded guilty to the one• count of promotion of sexual performance of a minor in exchange for the State's agreement to follow the sentencing guidelines of NRS 200.750(1) instead of NRS 200.750(2).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.