Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.260 (2026)

Unlawful contact with child or person with mental illness

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 207.260  Unlawful contact with child or person with mental illness.

      1.  A person who, without lawful authority, willfully and maliciously engages in a course of conduct with a child who is under 16 years of age and who is at least 5 years younger than the person which would cause a reasonable child of like age to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, and which actually causes the child to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, commits the crime of unlawful contact with a child.

      2.  A person who, without lawful authority, willfully and maliciously engages in a course of conduct with a person with mental illness which would cause a person with mental illness of like mental condition to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, and which actually causes the person with mental illness to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated or harassed, commits the crime of unlawful contact with a person with mental illness.

      3.  The penalties provided in this section do not preclude the victim from seeking any other legal remedy available.

      4.  Unless a greater penalty is provided by specific statute, a person who commits the crime of unlawful contact with a child or unlawful contact with a person with mental illness is guilty of:

      (a) For the first offense, a gross misdemeanor.

      (b) For the second and each subsequent offense, a category B felony and shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 6 years, and may be further punished by a fine of not more than $5,000.

      5.  As used in this section:

      (a) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct which consists of a series of acts over time that evidences a continuity of purpose directed at a specific person.

      (b) “Person with mental illness” means a person who has any mental dysfunction leading to impaired ability to maintain himself or herself and to function effectively in his or her life situation without external support.

      (c) “Without lawful authority” includes acts that are initiated or continued without the victim’s consent. The term does not include acts that are otherwise protected or authorized by constitutional or statutory law, regulation or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, including, but not limited to:

             (1) Picketing which occurs during a strike, work stoppage or any other labor dispute.

             (2) The activities of a reporter, photographer, camera operator or other person while gathering information for communication to the public if that person is employed or engaged by or has contracted with a newspaper, periodical, press association or radio or television station and is acting solely within that professional capacity.

             (3) The activities of a person that are carried out in the normal course of his or her lawful employment.

             (4) Any activities carried out in the exercise of the constitutionally protected rights of freedom of speech and assembly.

      (Added to NRS by 1963, 41; A 1967, 523; 1975, 79; 1979, 1456; 1995, 1240; 2001, 2789; 2003, 1377)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 59 P.3d 477 (Nev. 2002).
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 59 P.3d 477 (Nev. 2002). · cites it 46× “The City of Las Vegas seeks an extraordinary writ directing the district court to vacate its order holding that NRS 207.260 is unconstitutional. At the time relevant to this petition, NRS 207.”
Francis v. People, 63 V.I. 724 (2015). · cites it 3× “In Nevada, a prior version of Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 207.260 provided that any “person who annoys or molests a minor is guilty of a misdemeanor.”
Brown v. State, 934 P.2d 235 (Nev. 1997). “Annoyance or molestation of a child under NRS 207.260; 4. Sado-masochistic abuse under NRS 201.”
Moore (maurice) Vs. State, 2020 NV 71 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 2× “560 (luring a child under the age of 16); NRS 207.260 (unlawful contact with a child under the age of 16).”
Tiffee Vs. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct, 2021 NV 20 (Nev. 2021). · cites it 2× “Tiffee successfully completed probation, which, under the terms of the plea agreement, allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea and instead enter a guilty plea to unlawful contact with a child, a gross misdemeanor under NRS 207.260(4)(a). Pursuant to the plea agreement, the State…”
People v. Smith CA3 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “” This Nevada misdemeanor ( Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.260 ) corresponds to the offense in our Penal Code section 647.”
Robinson (maurice) v. State (Crim.) (Nev. 2026). “575 (stalking); NRS 207.260 (unlawfully contacting a child or person with a mental illness).”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.260(1)(a) — 1 case
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 59 P.3d 477 (Nev. 2002). “The City of Las Vegas seeks an extraordinary writ directing the district court to vacate its order holding that NRS 207.260 is unconstitutional. At the time relevant to this petition, NRS 207.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.260(4)(a) — 1 case
Tiffee Vs. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct, 2021 NV 20 (Nev. 2021). “Tiffee successfully completed probation, which, under the terms of the plea agreement, allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea and instead enter a guilty plea to unlawful contact with a child, a gross misdemeanor under NRS 207.260(4)(a). Pursuant to the plea agreement, the State…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.260(l)(a) — 1 case
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 59 P.3d 477 (Nev. 2002). “The City of Las Vegas seeks an extraordinary writ directing the district court to vacate its order holding that NRS 207.260 is unconstitutional. At the time relevant to this petition, NRS 207.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.