Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.10705
Legislative declaration concerning parole, probation and residential confinement
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 213.10705 Legislative declaration concerning parole, probation and
residential confinement. The
Legislature finds and declares that the release or continuation of a person on
parole or probation is an act of grace of the State. No person has a right to
parole or probation, or to be placed in residential confinement, and it is not
intended that the establishment of standards relating thereto create any such
right or interest in liberty or property or establish a basis for any cause of
action against the State, its political subdivisions, agencies, boards,
commissions, departments, officers or employees.
(Added to NRS by 1989, 1885; A 1991, 316)
Division of Parole and Probation of the Department of Public Safety
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: Stockmeier v. State, Board of Parole Commissioners
Stockmeier v. State, Board of Parole Commissioners (2011)
“NRS 213.10705; NRS 213.1099(1); see also Severance v.”
State Ex Rel. Board of Parole Commissioners v. Morrow (2011)
“” NRS 213.10705. Accordingly, because Nevada’s parole release statute does not create a liberty interest, we reiterate that inmates are not entitled to constitutional due process protections with respect to parole release hearings.”
Coles v. Bisbee (2018)
“1214(3) ; see also NRS 213.10705 (declaring that release on parole "is an act of grace of the State").”
ENGLE (JULIE) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (CRIMINAL) (2026)
““[P]robation is an act of grace of the State,” NRS 213.10705, that aims broadly to further a probationer’s rehabilitation, Seim v.”
Lepley (Brian) v. Director (2017)
“See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth u. Warden, 105 Nev.”
Ahud Chaziza v. Stammerjohn (2021)
“” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.10705 . Nevada awards prisoners 20 days of good-time credit for each month a prisoner commits “no serious infractions” and “performs in a faithful, orderly and peaceable manner the duties assigned to the offender.”
Rowell v. Dzurenda (2019)
“13 , 2009); see NRS § 213.10705 (stating that “[t]he Legislature finds and declares 28 that the release or continuation of a person on parole or probation is an act of grace of 2 establishment of standards relating thereto create any such right or interest in liberty or 3…”
Thomas v. The State of Nevada, Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections (2019)
“2010) (stating that Nevada’s statutory parole 5 || scheme does not create a liberty interest in parole); see also NRS § 213.10705 (stating 6 || that “[t]he Legislature finds and declares that the release or continuation of a person on 7 || parole or probation is an act of grace…”
Chaziza v. Stammerjohn (2019)
“See NRS § 213.10705 8 (stating that “[t]he Legislature finds and declares that the release or continuation of a 9 person on parole or probation is an act of grace of the State.”
Motley v. Dzurenda (2019)
“See also Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.10705 (stating that parole is an act 28 of legislative grace, and that no person has a right to be released on parole).”
Motley v. State of Nevada (2020)
“3d 662–63; see also NRS § 213.10705 (stating that parole “is an act 24 grace of the State”, and “[n]o person has a right to parole”).”
Franklin v. Hernandez (2020)
“2010); see Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.10705 (stating that 4 “[t]he Legislature finds and declares that the release or continuation of a person on parole or 5 probation is an act of grace of the State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.