Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.020
Legislative intent
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.020 Legislative intent.
1. By this chapter, the Legislature intends to establish minimum procedural requirements for the regulation-making and adjudication procedure of all agencies of the Executive Department of the State Government and for judicial review of both functions, except those agencies expressly exempted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. This chapter confers no additional regulation-making authority upon any agency except to the extent provided in subsection 1 of NRS 233B.050.
2. The provisions of this chapter are intended to supplement statutes applicable to specific agencies. This chapter does not abrogate or limit additional requirements imposed on such agencies by statute or otherwise recognized by law.
(Added to NRS by 1965, 962; A 1973, 472; 1977, 1384)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1970–2019 · leading case: Mineral County v. State, Board of Equalization
Mineral County v. State, Board of Equalization (2005)
“190, giving the Commissioner of Insurance authority to summarily revoke a certificate of authority, took precedence over NRS 233B.020, which requires an agency to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard to show compliance to the licensee before revocation.”
State Ex Rel. Sweikert v. Briare (1978)
“" NRS 233B.020. Even if any of the Act were adopted as establishing guidelines with which to evaluate the Las Vegas Civil Service rule, the findings are factually related.”
Clements v. Airport Authority of Washoe County (1995)
“NRS 233B.020(1) sets out the legislative intent behind the Act: By this chapter, the legislature intends to establish minimum procedural requirements for the regulation-making and adjudication procedure of all agencies of the executive department of the state government and for…”
Southern California Edison v. First Judicial District Court (2011)
“NRS 233B.020. NRS 233B.039 sets out which agencies are completely exempt from the application of NRS Chapter 233B.”
Bailey v. State (1979)
“1 That Act, by its very terms, is designed “to establish minimum procedural requirements for the regulation-making and adjudication procedure of all agencies of the executive department of the state government” unless expressly exempted, and is “intended to supplement statutes…”
Citizens for Honest & Responsible Government v. Heller (2000)
“See NRS 233B.020. The APA also establishes the procedures for judicial review of these functions.”
Public Service Commission v. Southwest Gas Corp. (1983)
“NRS 233B.020. Those procedural requirements mandate that, prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any regulation, an agency first must give at least thirty days’ notice of its intended action and the time, place, and manner in which interested persons may present their…”
STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. Republican Party (2011)
“See NRS 233B.020(1) (explaining that the APA is intended to establish minimum procedural requirements regarding regulation and adjudication within the agencies of the executive branch); NRS 233B.”
Sierra Life Insurance v. Rottman (1979)
“There is some disparity between the Administrative Procedure Act, NRS 233B.020, which requires the agency to provide notice and an opportunity to show compliance to the licensee, and NRS 680A.”
Gibbens Co., Inc. v. Archie (1976)
“NRS 233B.020. Those procedural requirements mandate that, prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any regulation, an agency first must give at least thirty days’ notice of its intended action and the time, place, and manner in which interested persons may present their…”
Villa v. Arriza-Balaga (1970)
“The Administrative Procedure Act applies to “all agencies of the executive department” (NRS 233B.020), and “agency” means “each public agency, bureau, board, commission, department, division, office or employee of the executive department” (NRS 233B.”
Deja Vu Showgirls v. State, Dep't of Tax. (2014)
“; NRS 233B.020; NRS 233B.130(6). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947k ae, Recognizing that a party aggrieved by a final Commission decision is limited to a petition for judicial review, we now consider whether the Legislature provided an exception to that rule in NLET's relevant…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.020(1) — 7 cases
Clements v. Airport Authority of Washoe County (1995)
“NRS 233B.020(1) sets out the legislative intent behind the Act: By this chapter, the legislature intends to establish minimum procedural requirements for the regulation-making and adjudication procedure of all agencies of the executive department of the state government and for…”
STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY v. Republican Party (2011)
“See NRS 233B.020(1) (explaining that the APA is intended to establish minimum procedural requirements regarding regulation and adjudication within the agencies of the executive branch); NRS 233B.”
Deja Vu Showgirls v. State, Dep't of Tax. (2014)
“; NRS 233B.020; NRS 233B.130(6). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947k ae, Recognizing that a party aggrieved by a final Commission decision is limited to a petition for judicial review, we now consider whether the Legislature provided an exception to that rule in NLET's relevant…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.020(2) — 1 case
Mineral County v. State, Board of Equalization (2005)
“190, giving the Commissioner of Insurance authority to summarily revoke a certificate of authority, took precedence over NRS 233B.020, which requires an agency to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard to show compliance to the licensee before revocation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.