Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 233B - NEVADA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 233B.032

“Contested case” defined

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 233B.032  “Contested case” defined.  “Contested case” means a proceeding, including but not restricted to rate making and licensing, in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by law to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for hearing, or in which an administrative penalty may be imposed.

      (Added to NRS by 1977, 1382)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2023 · leading case: City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor Commissioner
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City Plan Development, Inc. v. Office of the Labor Commissioner (2005) nev “” NRS 233B.032. Together, NRS 607.205 and NRS 607.”
Private Investigator's Licensing Board v. Atherley (1982) nev · cites it 2× “…a proceeding in which the rights of a party are required by law to be determined after an opportunity for a hearing. NRS 233B.032; 2 see also NRS 233B.127(1). 3 The procedures relating to process server licenses are contained in NRS Chapter 648. The statutes do not require…”
Citizens for Honest & Responsible Government v. Heller (2000) nev “NRS 233B.032 (emphasis added). The agency hearing must afford all parties an “opportunity .”
State Purchasing Div. v. George's Equip. (1989) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 233B.032 of that Act defines a contested case: “ ‘Contested case’ means a proceeding, including but not restricted to rate making and licensing, in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by law to be determined by an agency after an opportunity…”
Southern Nevada Operating Engineers Contract Compliance Trust v. Johnson (2005) nev “9 Under NRS 233B.032, a “ ‘ [contested case’ means a proceeding, including but not restricted to rate making and licensing, in which the legal rights, duties or privileges of a party are required by law to be determined by an agency after an opportunity for hearing, or in which…”
State v. City of Fallon (1984) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 233B.032. 9 The Commissioner’s failure in these cases to accept relevant evidence and to accord interested parties affected by his action a reasonable opportunity to be heard renders his action invalid as based upon unlawful procedure, Checker Cab v.”
STATE, DEP'T OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV.'S VS. SAMANTHA INC. (2017) nev · cites it 10× “322 does not constitute a contested case as defined by NRS 233B.032, the district court did not have authority to grant APA-based relief.”
STATE, DEP'T OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV.'S VS. SAMANTHA INC. (2017) nev · cites it 5× “322 does not constitute a contested case as defined by NRS 233B.032, the district court did not have authority to grant APA-based relief.”
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nevapp · cites it 4× “" NRS 233B.032. Parties to contested cases have statutory rights to: (1) receive notice of the proceeding; (2) be represented by counsel; and (3) respond to and present evidence.”
Tom v. Innovative Home Systems (2016) nev · cites it 2× “" NRS 233B.032. Parties to contested cases have statutory rights to: (1) receive notice of the proceeding; (2) be represented by counsel; and (3) respond to and present evidence.”
Village League v. State, Bd. of Equalization (2017) nev · cites it 2× “" 6 Pursuant to NRS 233B.032, a contested case is "a proceeding .”
TOM VS. INNOVATIVE HOME SYS., LLC C/W 66006 (2016) nev · cites it 2× “" NRS 233B.032. Parties to contested cases have statutory rights to: (1) receive notice of the proceeding; (2) be represented by counsel; and (3) respond to and present evidence.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.