Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 278 - PLANNING AND ZONING

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 278.010

Definitions

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 278.010  Definitions.  As used in NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 278.0103 to 278.0195, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

      [1:110:1941; A 1947, 834; 1943 NCL § 5063]—(NRS A 1969, 327; 1973, 1335; 1975, 1562; 1977, 186, 1494; 1979, 1497; 1981, 1181; 1985, 2115; 1987, 932, 1391, 1488; 1989, 766; 1991, 580, 952, 956, 1382, 1386; 1993, 2559; 1995, 1105, 2062, 2063, 2225; 1997, 606; 1999, 1137, 1421, 1975, 3365, 3373, 3465; 2001, 597, 1246, 2531, 2804; 2003, 596, 656, 681, 974, 1738, 2337, 2966; 2005, 185, 981, 1583; 2007, 340, 1539; 2009, 834, 2281, 2758; 2013, 1372, 3216; 2015, 311, 1990; 2017, 280, 1353, 1479; 2019, 969, 1295, 1410, 2532; 2021, 1298, 2347, 2585; 2023, 1164, 1269; 2025, 1077, 2377, 2802)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1975–2015 · leading case: Travelers Hotel, Ltd. v. City of Reno
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Travelers Hotel, Ltd. v. City of Reno (1987) nev · cites it 2× “Any person who has any right, title or interest in real property, and who has filed with the appropriate state or local agency an application for a permit which is required by statute or an ordinance, resolution or regulation adopted pursuant to NRS 278.010 to 278.630,…”
Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of Commissioners (1996) nev · cites it 4× “0233 states: Any person who has a right, title, or interest in real property, and who has filed with the appropriate state or local agency an application for a permit which is required by statute or an ordinance, resolution or regulation adopted pursuant to NRS 278.010 to…”
Mesagate Homeowners' Ass'n v. City of Fernley (2008) nev “” 11 Here, although Mesagate’s planning and zoning dispute is governed by NRS Chapter 278, not NRS Chapter 279 as in Hantges, NRS Chapter 278 includes a provision similar to one in NRS Chapter 279 recognizing and placing time limitations on actions “with respect to my final…”
Carson City v. Capital City Entertainment, Inc. (2002) nev “0235 provides a twenty-five-day limitations period for actions “commenced for the purpose of seeking judicial relief or review from or with respect to any final action, decision or order of any governing body, commission or board authorized by NRS 278.010 to 278.630 [the…”
Sagebrush Ltd. v. Carson City (1983) nev “If no action is taken within the time limits set forth in NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, a tentative map as filed shall be deemed to be approved, and the clerk of the governing body shall certify such approval.”
Convention Properties v. Washoe County Assessor (1990) nev · cites it 3× “The recording of a final map or parcel map, as those terms are defined in NRS 278.010, which creates one or more parcels not intended for agricultural use; 3.”
Vincent v. Santa Cruz (1982) nev “It is unlawful for any person to contract to sell, to sell or to transfer any subdivision or any part thereof, or land divided pursuant to a parcel map or map of division into large parcels, until the required map thereof, in full compliance with the appropriate provisions of…”
Flick Theater, Inc. v. City of Las Vegas (1988) nev · cites it 2× “For the purposes of NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, the governing body may divide the city, county or region into zoning districts of such number, shape and area as are best suited to carry out the purposes of NRS 278.”
Commercial Standard Insurance v. Tab Construction, Inc. (1978) nev “approve the map if the same conforms to all the requirements of NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive, and of any local ordinance applicable at the time of approval of the tentative map, or any rulings made thereunder.”
Williams v. Griffin (1975) nev “This is particularly true when one considers the mandates of NRS 278.010 et seq. requiring, among other things, public hearings pursuant to published notice.”
Howard Hughes Co., LLC v. Comm'r (2014) tax · cites it 2× “Summerlin West Las Vegas, pursuant to powers delegated by the State of Nevada by chapter 278 of the Nevada Revised Statutes , adopted in April 1992 the City General Plan, which is a master land use plan.”
Job's Peak Ranch v. Douglas Co. (2015) nev · cites it 2× “0235, any action seeking judicial review of a governing body's decision regarding a land development issue "authorized by NRS 278.010 to 278.630, inclusive," must be brought within 25 days after notice of the final decision has been filed with the clerk of the governing body.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.