Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 295 - CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL BALLOT QUESTIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 295.012 (2026)

Requirements for petition: Number of voters proposing must be apportioned equally among petition districts and number of signatures required from each petition district must be equal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 295.012  Requirements for petition: Number of voters proposing must be apportioned equally among petition districts and number of signatures required from each petition district must be equal.  The number of registered voters required pursuant to Section 1 or 2 of Article 19 of the Nevada Constitution to propose a petition for initiative or referendum must be apportioned equally among the petition districts, and the number of signatures required from each petition district must be equal.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 2743; A 2009, 2592; 2011, 1788, 3307)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: Marijuana Policy Proj. v. Miller, 578 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (D. Nev. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marijuana Policy Proj. v. Miller, 578 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (D. Nev. 2008). · cites it 6× “In response to this holding, in 2007, the Nevada Legislature adopted Nevada Revised Statute § 295.012. (See Intervenor’s Opp’n Pis.’ Mot.”
Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Auth. v. Miller, 191 P.3d 1138 (Nev. 2008). “18 NRS 295.012. 19 See NRS 293.12756-. 12795.”
Pest Comm. v. Miller, 648 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (D. Nev. 2009). “Subsequently, the Nevada Legislature passed NRS 295.012, which required initiative petitions to be signed by at least ten percent of the voters in every county in Nevada.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 295.012(1) — 1 case
Marijuana Policy Proj. v. Miller, 578 F. Supp. 2d 1290 (D. Nev. 2008). “In response to this holding, in 2007, the Nevada Legislature adopted Nevada Revised Statute § 295.012. (See Intervenor’s Opp’n Pis.’ Mot.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.