Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 38 - MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 38.247  Appeals.

      1.  An appeal may be taken from:

      (a) An order denying a motion to compel arbitration;

      (b) An order granting a motion to stay arbitration;

      (c) An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award;

      (d) An order modifying or correcting an award;

      (e) An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing; or

      (f) A final judgment entered pursuant to NRS 38.206 to 38.248, inclusive.

      2.  An appeal under this section must be taken as from an order or a judgment in a civil action.

      (Added to NRS by 2001, 1283)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). · cites it 25× “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Whitemaine v. Aniskovich, 183 P.3d 137 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 3× “We reject that contention and conclude that she preserved the issue for appeal by timely appealing from the order confirming the arbitration award in favor of respondents for two reasons.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “§ 25-2620; Nev.Rev.Stat. § 38.247; N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:23B-28; N.”
Casey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 290 P.3d 265 (Nev. 2012). · cites it 2× “239, the motion qualified as an “application for judicial relief under NRS 38.”
Truck Ins. Exch. v. Palmer J. Swanson, Inc., 189 P.3d 656 (Nev. 2008). “As to the remaining issues raised by the parties, we conclude that they are without merit. Hardesty and Parraguirre, JJ., concur.”
DR Horton, Inc. v. Green, 96 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2004). “DISCUSSION Standard of review Under NRS 38.247(1)(a), an order denying a motion to compel arbitration is directly appealable.”
State Ex Rel. Masto v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct., 199 P.3d 828 (Nev. 2009). “2d 352, 353 (1980); NRS 38.247. Whether the MSA compels arbitration by its plain language Whether a dispute arising under a contract is arbitrable is a matter of contract interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo.”
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court, 199 P.3d 828 (Nev. 2009). “2d 352, 353 (1980); NRS 38.247. Whether the MSA compels arbitration by its plain language Whether a dispute arising under a contract is arbitrable is a matter of contract interpretation, which is a question of law that we review de novo.”
Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. v. Am. Heritage, Inc., 110 P.3d 481 (Nev. 2005). “As permitted under NRS 38.247, Nevada Gold appealed from the district court’s order.”
Maide, LLC v. Dileo, 2022 NV 9 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “3See NRS 38.247(1)(a) (providing that an order denying a motion to compel arbitration may be appealed).”
Mikohn Gaming Corp. v. McCrea, 89 P.3d 36 (Nev. 2004). · cites it 2× “205(1)(a) (repealed 2001) (current version at NRS 38.247). 11 Fritz Hansen A/S, 116 Nev.”
Chan Vs. Wu (Nev. 2020). · cites it 6× “Accordingly, appellants appear to concede that the March 22, 2019, order is not appealable under NRS 38.”
Show all 32 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(1) — 5 cases
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Chan Vs. Wu (Nev. 2020). “Accordingly, appellants appear to concede that the March 22, 2019, order is not appealable under NRS 38.”
Willis Of Ariz., Inc. v. Hakkasan Usa, Inc. C/W 82833 (Nev. 2022).
Ajs Constr., Inc. v. Pankopf (Nev. 2013).
Kjh & Rda Inv. Grp., LLC v. turnberry/mgm Grand Towers, LLC (Nev. 2014).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(1)(a) — 11 cases
Truck Ins. Exch. v. Palmer J. Swanson, Inc., 189 P.3d 656 (Nev. 2008). “As to the remaining issues raised by the parties, we conclude that they are without merit. Hardesty and Parraguirre, JJ., concur.”
DR Horton, Inc. v. Green, 96 P.3d 1159 (Nev. 2004). “DISCUSSION Standard of review Under NRS 38.247(1)(a), an order denying a motion to compel arbitration is directly appealable.”
Maide, LLC v. Dileo, 2022 NV 9 (Nev. 2022). “3See NRS 38.247(1)(a) (providing that an order denying a motion to compel arbitration may be appealed).”
Mikohn Gaming Corp. v. McCrea, 89 P.3d 36 (Nev. 2004). “205(1)(a) (repealed 2001) (current version at NRS 38.247). 11 Fritz Hansen A/S, 116 Nev.”
Kjh & Rda Inv. Grp., LLC v. turnberry/mgm Grand Towers, LLC (Nev. 2014).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(1)(c) — 2 cases
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Chan Vs. Wu (Nev. 2020). “Accordingly, appellants appear to concede that the March 22, 2019, order is not appealable under NRS 38.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(1)(e) — 2 cases
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Nordic PCL Constr., Inc. v. LPIHGC, LLC. ICA Order Dismissing Appeal by Hiraoka, J., filed 09/30/2024 [ada], 156 Haw. 16. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 11/29/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 01/09/2025 [ada]. (Haw. 2025).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(1)(f) — 1 case
Chan Vs. Wu (Nev. 2020). “Accordingly, appellants appear to concede that the March 22, 2019, order is not appealable under NRS 38.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(2) — 2 cases
First 100, LLC v. Louie (Nev. 2018).
Chan Vs. Wu (Nev. 2020). “Accordingly, appellants appear to concede that the March 22, 2019, order is not appealable under NRS 38.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(a)(1) — 4 cases
Tallman Vs. Dist. Ct. (cps Sec. (usa), Inc.), 2015 NV 71 (Nev. 2015).
Mika Vs. Dist. Ct. (cps Sec. (usa), Inc.), 2015 NV 71 (Nev. 2015).
Tallman Vs. Dist. Ct. (cps Sec. (usa), Inc.), 2015 NV 71 (Nev. 2015).
Mika Vs. Dist. Ct. (cps Sec. (usa), Inc.), 2015 NV 71 (Nev. 2015).
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(l)(c) — 2 cases
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Casey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 290 P.3d 265 (Nev. 2012). “239, the motion qualified as an “application for judicial relief under NRS 38.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 38.247(l)(e) — 1 case
Karcher Firestopping v. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc., 204 P.3d 1262 (Nev. 2009). “The Legislature has authorized appeals from certain arbitration-related orders as set forth in NRS 38.247(1). Under this statutory scheme, if the order challenged on appeal had only denied appellant’s motion to confirm the arbitration award, it would be appealable under NRS 38.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.