Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 40.6462 (2026)
Access to residence or appurtenance with alleged defect after notice of defect is given
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 40.6462 Access to residence or appurtenance with alleged defect after
notice of defect is given. After
notice of a constructional defect is given to a contractor pursuant to NRS 40.645, the claimant shall, upon
reasonable notice, allow the contractor and each subcontractor, supplier or
design professional who may be responsible for the alleged defect reasonable
access to the residence or appurtenance that is the subject of the notice to
determine the nature and extent of a constructional defect and the nature and
extent of repairs that may be necessary. To the extent possible, the persons
entitled to inspect shall coordinate and conduct the inspections in a manner
which minimizes the inconvenience to the claimant.
(Added to NRS by 2003, 2036; A 2015, 12)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: D.R. Horton, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.), 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015).
D.R. Horton, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.), 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015). “Horton's motion sought to compel High Noon "to comply with NRS 40.6462 and provide access to each unit at the [slubject [p]roperty where construction defects are alleged to exist for inspection by continued on next page.”
D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct, 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015). “Horton's motion sought to compel High Noon "to comply with NRS 40.6462 and provide access to each unit at the [s]ubject [p]roperty where construction defects are alleged to exist for inspection by continued on next page.”
D.R. Horton, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.), 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015). “Horton's motion sought to compel High Noon "to comply with NRS 40.6462 and provide access to each unit at the [s]ubject [p]roperty where construction defects are alleged to exist for inspection by continued on next page.”
D.R. Horton, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.), 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015). “Horton's motion sought to compel High Noon "to comply with NRS 40.6462 and provide access to each unit at the [slubject [p]roperty where construction defects are alleged to exist for inspection by continued on next page.”
D.R. Horton, Inc. Vs. Dist. Ct. (arlington Ranch Homeowners Ass'n.), 2015 NV 86 (Nev. 2015). “Horton's motion sought to compel High Noon "to comply with NRS 40.6462 and provide access to each unit at the [s]ubject [p]roperty where construction defects are alleged to exist for inspection by continued on next page.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.