NRS
432B.280 Confidentiality of information maintained by an agency which
provides child welfare services; exceptions; penalty.
1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 239.0115, 432B.165, 432B.175 and 439.597 and except as otherwise authorized or
required pursuant to NRS 432B.290,
information maintained by an agency which provides child welfare services,
including, without limitation, reports and investigations made pursuant to this
chapter, is confidential.
2. Any person, law enforcement agency or
public agency, institution or facility who willfully releases or disseminates
such information, except:
(a) Pursuant to a criminal prosecution relating
to the abuse or neglect of a child;
(b) As otherwise authorized pursuant to NRS 432B.165 and 432B.175;
(c) As otherwise authorized or required pursuant
to NRS 432B.290;
(d) As otherwise authorized or required pursuant
to NRS 439.597; or
(e) As otherwise required pursuant to NRS 432B.513,
Ê is guilty of
a gross misdemeanor.
(Added to NRS by 1985,
1373; A 1999,
2032; 2001,
1701; 2007,
195, 1507,
1980,
2106;
2013,
525)
Notes of Decisions
Ansara v. Maldonado (D. Nev. 2022).
· cites it 4× “19 NRS § 432B.280 provides that subject to certain exceptions, “all information maintained 20 by a [sic] child welfare services—such as reports and investigations—are confidential.”
Langford v. Baker (D. Nev. 2023).
· cites it 2× “025(1); NRS § 432B.280. 19 In addition, the need to protect medical privacy generally qualifies as a “compelling 20 reason” for sealing records in connection with a dispositive motion.”
Crockford v. Clark Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. (D. Nev. 2025).
· cites it 2× “23 4 I have reviewed the sealed response and exhibits in camera, and I conclude that, though 5 there are compelling reasons to seal portions of the County’s exhibit that contain child-welfare 6 reports and information concerning allegations of minor abuse before a juvenile…”
Crockford (D. Nev. 2025).
· cites it 2× “37 ECF No 101 at 2–5; Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 432B.280, 432B.430. 1 Finally, Crockford argues that the County seeks sealing only as part of an attempt to 2 “withhold or obscure the very evidence that proves their constitutional violations.”
Clark Cnty. Dep't. of Fam. Serv. v. Dist. Ct. (sharp), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 10 (Nev. 2025).
· cites it 2× “Included within that statute is subsection 2(e), which allows disclosure to "a court other than a juvenile court, for in camera inspection only, unless the court determines that public disclosure of the information is necessary for the deterrnination of an issue before it.”
Mchaney Vs. Dist. Ct. (Clark Cty. Dep'T Of Fam. Servs.) (Nev. 2020).
“' Having reviewed the petition, answers, and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not 'As real party in interest's proposed appendix, provisionally received in this court on June 18, 2020, contains confidential information filed under seal…”
Fratello (D. Nev. 2025).
“290(e) provides that a child welfare services agency may provide 10 information to a court “for in camera inspection only, unless the court determines that public 11 disclosure of the information is necessary for the determination of an issue before it.”
State, Div. Child & Fam. Serv. v. Dist. Ct., 81 P.3d 512 (Nev. 2003).
· cites it 2× “[4] DCFS contends that NRS 432B.280 [5] and NAC 127.200 [6] mandate the confidentiality of adoption records unless an exception for disclosure is allowed under NRS 432B.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 432B.280(1) — 1 case
Crockford v. Clark Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs. (D. Nev. 2025).
“23 4 I have reviewed the sealed response and exhibits in camera, and I conclude that, though 5 there are compelling reasons to seal portions of the County’s exhibit that contain child-welfare 6 reports and information concerning allegations of minor abuse before a juvenile…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.