Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.363 (2026)

Petition for hearing by Board; notice and conduct of hearing

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 463.363  Petition for hearing by Board; notice and conduct of hearing.

      1.  Within 20 days after the date of receipt of the written decision of the agent, the aggrieved party may file a petition with the Board requesting a hearing to reconsider the decision.

      2.  The petition must set forth the basis of the request for reconsideration.

      3.  If no petition for reconsideration is filed within the time prescribed in subsection 1, the decision shall be deemed final action on the matter and is not subject to reconsideration by the Board or to review by the Commission or any court.

      4.  The party requesting the hearing must provide a copy of the petition to the other party.

      5.  Within 15 days after service of the petition, the responding party may answer the allegations contained therein by filing a written response with the Board.

      6.  The Board shall schedule a hearing and may conduct the hearing as provided in subsection 4 of NRS 463.110, except that notice of the date, time and place of the hearing must be provided by the Board to both parties.

      7.  The hearing must be conducted in accordance with regulations adopted by the Commission.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 1846; A 1987, 188; 1989, 1265; 1991, 2146)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Harrah's Club v. Nevada State Gaming Control Bd., 766 P.2d 900 (Nev. 1988).
Harrah's Club v. Nevada State Gaming Control Bd., 766 P.2d 900 (Nev. 1988). “NRS 463.363. NRS 463.365 provided for judicial review of NGCB decisions.”
Friedlander v. Tamarack Junction Race & Sports Book (civil), 142 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 23 (Nev. 2026). “If a patron is aggrieved by the Board agent's decision, they may petition for reconsideration by the Board, NRS 463.363, and subsequently for judicial review by a district court, NRS 463.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.