Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 47 - GENERAL PROVISIONS; JUDICIAL NOTICE; PRESUMPTIONS

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.130

Matters of fact

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 47.130  Matters of fact.

      1.  The facts subject to judicial notice are facts in issue or facts from which they may be inferred.

      2.  A judicially noticed fact must be:

      (a) Generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court; or

      (b) Capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned,

Ê so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 777)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2019) nev “3 (explaining that the entity selling the loan to Freddie Mac must endorse the promissory note in blank at the time Freddie Mac purchases the loan); id.”
BLIGE v. TERRY (2023) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 47.130(2)(b) provides that a court may take judicial notice of facts “[clapable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned, so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute.”
Round Hill General Improvement District v. Newman (1981) nev “Nor is it reasonably subject to dispute, see NRS 47.130, that the federal litigation in question involves the same area as Lake Tahoe: the Truckee River rises out of Lake Tahoe.”
Halverson v. Hardcastle (2007) nev “NRS 47.130. 50 NRS 3.025(2)(a)-(c). 51 NRS 3.”
Lueck v. Teuton (2009) nev · cites it 2× “NRS 47.130(2). [2] The Governor, Judge Teuton, and the Family Law Section point to NRS 3.”
Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Dodds (2011) nev “” NRS 47.130(2). Several courts have concluded that “[a] court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court ‘not for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation, but rather to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings.”
In Re Amerco Derivative Litigation (2011) nev “We may take judicial notice of facts that are "[g]enerally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court," as well as those that are "[c]apable of accurate and ready determination.”
MacK v. Estate of MacK (2009) nev “” See NRS 47.130(2)(b). As a general rule, we will not take judicial notice of records in another and different case, even though the cases are connected.”
O'Connell v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC (2018) nevapp “Further, despite the lack of an affidavit and based on O'Connell's representations in her application for fees, the district court could have sworn in counsel at the hearing to accept testimony supporting the fee request or possibly have taken judicial notice of certain facts.”
In re Change of Name: Salazar (2022) nev · cites it 2× “3d 98, 106 (2009) (recognizing that "we may take judicial notice of facts that are `[c]apable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned, so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute' (quoting NRS…”
Fierle v. Perez (2009) nev “" See NRS 47.130(2)(b). Moreover, courts generally may take judicial notice of legislative histories, which are public records.”
Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline (1992) nev “See NRS 47.130(1) (court may take judicial notice of facts in issue or facts from which facts in issue may be inferred); NRS *291 47.”
Show all 54 citing cases →
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.130(1) — 1 case
Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline (1992) nev “See NRS 47.130(1) (court may take judicial notice of facts in issue or facts from which facts in issue may be inferred); NRS *291 47.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.130(2) — 9 cases
Lueck v. Teuton (2009) nev “NRS 47.130(2). [2] The Governor, Judge Teuton, and the Family Law Section point to NRS 3.”
Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Dodds (2011) nev “” NRS 47.130(2). Several courts have concluded that “[a] court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court ‘not for the truth of the matters asserted in the other litigation, but rather to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings.”
In Re Amerco Derivative Litigation (2011) nev “We may take judicial notice of facts that are "[g]enerally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court," as well as those that are "[c]apable of accurate and ready determination.”
Cassinari v. Mapes (1975) nev
Jory v. Bennight (1975) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.130(2)(b) — 15 cases
BLIGE v. TERRY (2023) nev “NRS 47.130(2)(b) provides that a court may take judicial notice of facts “[clapable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned, so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute.”
MacK v. Estate of MacK (2009) nev “” See NRS 47.130(2)(b). As a general rule, we will not take judicial notice of records in another and different case, even though the cases are connected.”
In re Change of Name: Salazar (2022) nev “3d 98, 106 (2009) (recognizing that "we may take judicial notice of facts that are `[c]apable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned, so that the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute' (quoting NRS…”
Fierle v. Perez (2009) nev “" See NRS 47.130(2)(b). Moreover, courts generally may take judicial notice of legislative histories, which are public records.”
Caballero v. Seventh Judicial District Court (2007) nev
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 47.130(b) — 1 case
Golden Creek Holdings, Inc. v. Quality Loan Servicing Corporation (2023) nvd
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.