Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 484A - TRAFFIC LAWS GENERALLY

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 484A.095

“Highway” defined

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 484A.095  “Highway” defined.  “Highway” means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way dedicated to a public authority when any part of the way is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular traffic, whether or not the public authority is maintaining the way.

      (Added to NRS by 1969, 1478; A 1981, 1690)—(Substituted in revision for NRS 484.065)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2019–2025 · leading case: URIAS (BRANDON) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (CRIMINAL)
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
URIAS (BRANDON) v. DIST. CT. (STATE) (CRIMINAL) (2025) nev “" NRS 484A.095. Applying general principles of English grammar, the phrase "to which persons have access as invitees or licensees" modifies highways, not "such other premises.”
Chrisman v. Howell (2022) nvd · cites it 5× “) Specifically, Chrisman argues that the State failed to present any evidence 6 that the roadway in question was “dedicated to a public authority.”
Neagle v. Johnson (2022) nvd · cites it 2× “” NRS 484A.095. Thus, under NRS 484C.430, a defendant who, while 21 intoxicated, drives a vehicle anywhere in Nevada and causes a victim substantial bodily 22 harm is guilty of a category B felony.”
Chrisman (Michael) v. State (2019) nev “" NRS 484A.095. Evidence is sufficient to support a verdict if "any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Chrisman (Michael) v. State (2019) nev “" NRS 484A.095. Evidence is sufficient to support a verdict if "any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Chrisman v. Howell (2020) nvd “" NRS 484A.095. Evidence is sufficient to support a verdict if "any rational trier of fact could have found the 15 essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Neagle v. Johnson (2022) nvd “" NRS 484A.095. Thus, under NRS 484C.430, a 11 defendant who, while intoxicated, drives a vehicle anywhere in Nevada and causes a 12 victim substantial bodily harm is guilty of a category B felony.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.