Nev. Rev. Stat. § 52.025
Testimony of witness with knowledge
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 52.025 Testimony of witness with knowledge. The
testimony of a witness is sufficient for authentication or identification if
the witness has personal knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be.
(Added to NRS by 1971, 798)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: BLIGE v. TERRY
BLIGE v. TERRY (2023)
“" NRS 52.025. The district court did not ctbuse its discretion in admitting evidence related to Bitcoin transfers and text messages Blige argues that Terry failed to authenticate screenshots of Bitcoin transfers to her and to Terry's car dealer, as well as copies of text…”
Theriault v. State (1976)
“NRS 52.025 provides that testimony of a witness is sufficient for authentication or identification if he has personal knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be.”
Wickliffe Ex Rel. Heirs of the Estate v. Sunrise Hospital, Inc. (1985)
“3 According to an offer of proof, Nurse Woods would have testified that the rolodex was the manual in effect in 1978.”
Frias v. Valle (1985)
“The provisions of NRS 52.025 to 52.105, inclusive, are illustrative and not restrictive examples of authentication or identification which conform to the requirements of this section.”
Stickelman v. Moroni (1981)
“We have reviewed the testimony and conclude that the requirement of NRS 52.025 relating to the authenticity of photographic evidence was met.”
TALLEY (OMAR) v. STATE (2025)
“See NRS 52.025 (“The testimony of a witness is sufficient for authentication or identification if the witness has personal knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be.”
O'Neill v. Baker (2020)
“With regard to 26 authenticating Petitioner’s handwriting samples, NRS § 52.025 provides that “[t]he 27 testimony of a witness is sufficient for authentication or identification if the witness has 1 provides that “[t]he requirement of authentication or identification as a…”
Mishler v. McNally (1986)
“015(1); NRS 52.025. Moreover, the judgmental statements in the memo regarding Dr.”
Sanders v. Sears-Page (2015)
“In addition, NRS 52.025 through NRS 52.105 provide a nonexhaustive list of methods by which a document may be authenticated.”
SANDERS VS. SEARS-PAGE (2015)
“Medical records delivered pursuant to a subpoena must "be kept in the custody of the clerk of the court issuing the subpoena, in a sealed container supplied by the custodian of the medical record.”
SANDERS VS. SEARS-PAGE (2015)
“Medical records delivered pursuant to a subpoena must "be kept in the custody of the clerk of the court issuing the subpoena, in a sealed container supplied by the custodian of the medical record.”
Sanders v. Sears-Page (2015)
“Medical records delivered pursuant to a subpoena must "be kept in the custody of the clerk of the court issuing the subpoena, in a sealed container supplied by the custodian of the medical record.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.